Akzo Salt Company, Inc. (ALJ decision, August 31, 1995)

Akzo Salt Company, Inc. (FMSHRC LAKE 95-201-DM): Damages and penalty ordered

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
LAKE 95-201-DM
Decided
August 31, 1995
Presiding judge
Outcome
Modified
Precedential status
Reviewed by the Commission
Checked against source
2026-08-13
Cited standards

What's the rule today?

This ALJ decision was superseded by the Commission's decision in the same case. Ezel starts from the controlling decision and answers your situation under current law, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1995
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
ALJ decision, later reviewed by the Commission
This decision was issued by an FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge, but it was not the final word in the case: the Commission directed review, and the Commission's decision is the one citable as precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The parties stipulated to $2,542.04 in damages owed to James Rieke in a Mine Act discrimination proceeding. Judge Gary Melick ordered Akzo Salt Company to pay those damages and a $2,000 civil penalty within 30 days. The order added those amounts to the remedies directed in the judge's August 7, 1995 interlocutory decision. The official index shows that the Commission later reviewed the case.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)
  • Outcome: Akzo was ordered to pay $2,542.04 in damages and a $2,000 civil penalty.
  • Key point: The judge incorporated stipulated damages and an additional civil penalty into the remedies for the discrimination proceeding.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041

August 31, 1995

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
:
ON BEHALF OF JAMES RIEKE,
: Docket No. LAKE 95-201-DM
Petitioner
: NC-DC 94-10
:
v. : Cleveland Mine
: Mine ID 33-06994
AKZO SALT COMPANY, INC.,
:
Respondent
:

DECISION

Appearances: Lisa A. Gray, Esq., Ruben R. Chapa, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Chicago, Illinois for Complainant;
William Michael Hanna, Esq., Squire, Sanders and Dempsey, Cleveland, Ohio for Respondent

Before: Judge Melick

Pursuant to the interlocutory decision issued in this case on August 7, 1995, the parties have stipulated to damages due the complainant, James Rieke, of $2,542.04.

ORDER

In addition to the other remedies directed in the decision dated August 7, 1995, Akzo Salt Company, Inc. is hereby directed to pay within 30 days of the date of this decision (1) a civil penalty of $2,000 and (2) damages of $2,542.04 to James Rieke.

Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
703-756-6261

Distribution:

Ruben Chapa, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 230 S. Dearborn Street, 8th Floor, Chicago, IL 60604

William Michael Hanna, Esq., Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, 4900 Society Center, 127 Public Square, Cleveland, OH 44114
/jf

What controls your case today?

The Commission reviewed this case, and its decision is the one that controls. Ezel starts there and answers your situation under current law, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace