Consolidation Coal Company (ALJ decision, June 16, 1999)
Consolidation Coal Company (FMSHRC LAKE 94-704-D): Discrimination settlement approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1999 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Consolidation Coal Company faced a discrimination proceeding brought on behalf of Kenneth Hannah, Phillip J. Payne, and Floyd Mezo, along with a civil penalty petition. Judge Gary Melick approved a settlement requiring back pay and interest, expungement of references to the incident from personnel records, an agreed posting, and a $500 civil penalty. The judge ordered the parties to comply within 40 days and dismissed the case.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c), 30 U.S.C. § 815(d)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, the parties were ordered to comply with its terms, and the case was dismissed.
- Key point: The approved settlement combined discrimination relief with a $500 civil penalty and an agreed posting.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
June 16, 1999
SECRETARY OF LABOR
: DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. LAKE 94-704-D on behalf of KENNETH HANNAH, : PHILLIP J. PAYNE and : MSHA Case No. VINC CD 94-07
FLOYD MEZO,
:
Complainants : Mine ID No. 11-00601
:
v. :
:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, :
Respondent : Rend Lake Mine
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Melick
This case is before me upon a Complaint of Discrimination and a Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty under Sections 105(c) and 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). Petitioner has filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss the case. The terms of settlement include back pay and interest, expungement from personnel records of references to the incident at issue, an agreed posting and payment of a $500.00 civil penalty. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case, and I concluded that the proferred settlement is acceptable.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that the parties comply with all the terms of the settlement within 40 days of this order. Under the circumstances this case is dismissed.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
703-756-6261
Distribution:
Rafael Alvarez, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Dept. of Labor, 230 South Dearborn St., 8th Floor, Chicago, IL 60604
David J. Hardy, Esq., Jackson & Kelly, 1600 Laidley Tower, P.O. Box 553, Charleston, WV 25322
Elizabeth S. Chamberlin, Esq., Consol Inc., Consol Plaza, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Pittsburgh, PA 15241
\mca
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace