Jefferson Materials Company (ALJ decision, February 23, 1993)

Jefferson Materials Company (FMSHRC LAKE 93-40-M): Settlement approved

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
LAKE 93-40-M
Decided
February 23, 1993
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-15

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1993
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

MSHA assessed $1,200 in civil penalties against Jefferson Materials Company for violations at its Howitt Plant. The proposed settlement reduced the total to $960, an across-the-board 20 percent reduction, even though the violations were characterized as highly likely to result in a fatality. Judge Paul Merlin approved the settlement based on the operator's small size and history, while directing the Solicitor to explain similar reductions explicitly in future cases. The operator was ordered to pay $960 within 30 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): The decision does not identify a specific standard section.
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved and the operator was ordered to pay a $960 penalty.
  • Key point: The judge approved the reduction based on the operator's small size and history but criticized unexplained across-the-board reductions.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
: Docket No. LAKE 93-40-M
Petitioner : A. C. No. 33-01526-05506 :
v. :
:
:
JEFFERSON MATERIALS COMPANY, : Howitt Plant Respondent :

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Before: Judge Merlin

This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of the civil penalties under section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. The Solicitor has filed a motion to approve settlement. A reduction in the penalty from $1,200 to $960 is proposed. It appears that the proposed settlement is an across the board twenty percent reduction in assessments which gives no reasons, even though the violations are characterized as highly likely to result in a fatality. Nevertheless, based on the information in the file I approve the settlement in light of the operator's small size and history under the criteria set forth in section 110(i) of the Act.

The Solicitor should be aware however, such across the board reductions are troubling and in the future she must explicitly explain why the recommended amounts are appropriate.

WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that the operator pay a penalty of $960 within 30 days of this order.
Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge

Distribution: (Certified Mail)

Elizabeth R. Ashley, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 881 Federal Bldg., 1240 East Ninth St., Cleveland, OH 44199

John E. Lower, Jefferson Materials Company, 8505 State Route 14, Streetsboro, Ohio 44241

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace