USX Corp, Minnesota Ore Operations (ALJ decision, June 2, 1993)

USX Corp, Minnesota Ore Operations (FMSHRC LAKE 92-399-M-A): Penalty corrected and $800 overpayment refunded

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
LAKE 92-399-M-A
Decided
June 2, 1993
Presiding judge
Outcome
Modified
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-14
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1993
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: FMSHRC released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

USX Corporation had paid a $5,767 assessment in LAKE 92-399-M-A, including an $800 penalty for Citation 3892662. A later settlement decision also included that citation and reduced its proposed penalty to $311, so the operator asked to reopen the matter after discovering the duplication. Judge Paul Merlin found that a clerical error had placed the citation in the dismissal and penalty orders even though USX had asked to keep it out. He vacated dismissal as to the citation, corrected the docket penalty to $4,967, and ordered MSHA to refund $800.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 29 C.F.R. § 2700.65(c)
  • Outcome: Dismissal was vacated as to Citation 3892662, the docket penalty was corrected to $4,967, and an $800 overpayment was ordered refunded.
  • Key point: A clerical docketing error can justify reopening a penalty order and correcting the resulting overpayment.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) : Docket No. LAKE 92-399-M-A Petitioner : A. C. No. 21-00820-05700-R :
v. : Minntac Plant
:
USX CORPORATION, MINNESOTA :
ORE OPERATIONS,
:
Respondent :

ORDER PARTIALLY VACATING ORDER OF DISMISSAL ORDER AMENDING DECISION APPROVING PENALTY ORDER TO REFUND

Before: Judge Merlin

On November 19, 1992, the operator filed a motion to withdraw its contest of those violations contained in Docket No. LAKE 92-399-M which were designated non-significant and substantial. On January 5, 1993, an order was issued removing the non-significant and substantial violations from LAKE 92-399-M and placing them in a newly created docket, LAKE 92-399-M-A. On the same day, a decision approving penalty was issued in LAKE 92-399-M-A approving the proposed penalties, dismissing the matter and directing the operator to pay the proposed penalties. On April 28, 1993, Administrative Law Judge Feldman issued a decision approving settlements for sixteen cases involving this operator including Docket No. LAKE 92-399-M.

On May 14, 1993, the operator filed a motion to reopen this proceeding. The operator advised that in its motion to withdraw it had requested that its contest be withdrawn for all the non-significant and substantial violations in LAKE 92-399-M except Citation No. 3892662. The operator also stated that it paid the $5,767 assessment in LAKE 92-399-M-A which included the $800 penalty for Citation No. 3892662.

In addition, Citation No. 3892662 was included in the April 28 settlement decision issued by Judge Feldman. The proposed penalty for this violation was reduced from $800 to $311 which was included in the total assessments the operator was ordered to pay by Judge Feldman. The operator states that it has paid this assessment.

A review of the file shows that the operator did request that this citation not be dismissed. However, due to a clerical error the citation was included in the January 5 order of removal and replacement as well as in the decision approving penalty and order of dismissal. I conclude partial relief from the decision approving penalty and order of dismissal is warranted. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.65(c). Therefore, the January 5 decision approving penalty should be amended to reflect the amount due without Citation No. 3892662 and the order of dismissal should be vacated with respect to this violation. The approval of the settlement by Judge Feldman for Citation No. 3892662 will stand because that violation would have been properly before him when his decision was issued were it not for the clerical error, noted above. In light of the foregoing, I find that in this case the operator overpaid MSHA $800 for Citation No. 3892662 and that amount should be refunded to the operator.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the January 5 order of dismissal issued with respect to Citation No. 3892662 in LAKE 92-399-M-A be VACATED.

It is further ORDERED that the January 5 decision approving penalty issued for LAKE 92-399-M-A be amended to reflect the correct penalty amount of $4,967.

It is further ORDERED that the operator's overpayment of $800 for LAKE 92-399-M-A be REFUNDED to the operator.

Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Miguel J. Carmona, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Depart-
ment of Labor, 230 S. Dearborn Street, 8th Floor, Chicago, IL
60604 (Certified Mail)

Billy M. Tennant, Esq., USS a Div. of USX Corp., 600 Grant
Street, Room 1580, Pittsburgh, PA 15219-4776 (Certified Mail)

Mr. James Ranta, United Steel Workers of America, P. O. Box 84,
Chisholm, MN 55719 (Certified Mail)

/gl

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace