Wallace Enterprises, Inc.
Wallace Enterprises, Inc. (FMSHRC LAKE 92-342, LAKE 92-343, and LAKE 92-344): Default judgment entered for $1,540
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Wallace Enterprises did not appear at the hearing in three civil penalty proceedings involving its Middle Fork Mine. The company also did not respond to the judge's order to show cause why a default decision should not be entered. Judge Avram Weisberger granted the Secretary's motion for default decision and ordered Wallace Enterprises to pay the full proposed penalties totaling $1,540. The decision does not identify the underlying safety standards in its text.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: None identified in the decision text.
- Outcome: Default judgment was entered for the Secretary, and Wallace Enterprises was ordered to pay $1,540.
- Key point: Failure to appear and failure to answer an order to show cause can result in default judgment for the full proposed penalties.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. WALLACE ENTERPRISES, INC.
DDATE:
19930517
TTEXT:
Page 2
~902
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. LAKE 92-342
Petitioner : A.C. No. 12-02090-03502
:
v. : Docket No. LAKE 92-343
: A.C. No. 12-02090-03503
WALLACE ENTERPRISES, INC., :
Respondent : Docket No. LAKE 92-344
: A.C. No. 12-02090-03504
:
: Middle Fork Mine
DECISION
Appearances: Rafael Alvarez, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor,
Office of the Solicitor; U.S. Department of Labor,
Chicago, Illinois for Petitioner;
No Appearance for Respondent.
Before: Judge Weisberger
Respondent did not appear at the hearing in these cases that
was scheduled for March 16, 1993, and Petitioner made a Motion
for Default Decision on March 20, 1993. An Order to Show Cause
was issued which inter alia provided as follows:
Therefore, it is ORDERED that within 10 days of
this order, Respondent shall, in writing, show cause
why a default decision shall not be entered in these
cases. If the Respondent does not respond to this
order, or fails to establish why a default decision
shall not be issued, a decision will be issued ordering
Respondent to pay $1,540 the full penalties proposed by
Petitioner in these cases.
Respondent has not responded to the order to show cause.
Accordingly, the Motion for Default Decision is GRANTED.
It is ORDERED that the judgment be issued in these cases in
favor of Petitioner. It is further ORDERED that Respondent pay
$1,540 the full penalties proposed by Petitioner in these cases.
Avram Weisberger
Administrative Law Judge
Page 3
~903
Distribution:
Rafael Alvarez, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department
of Labor, 230 S. Dearborn Street, 8th Floor, Chicago, IL 60604
(Certified Mail)
Mr. Larry Wallace, President, P.O. Box 141, Rockport, IN 47635
(Certified Mail) (Regular Mail)
nb
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1993, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.