Old Ben Coal Company
Old Ben Coal Company (FMSHRC LAKE 91-718 and related dockets): Settlement approved and penalties reduced
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1992 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Old Ben Coal Company faced consolidated civil penalty proceedings involving its No. 24, No. 25, and No. 26 Mines. Judge Avram Weisberger severed the cases from a larger docket so they could be decided separately, then considered the parties' settlement motion after a hearing on another matter. The settlement reduced the proposed penalties from $3,443 to $1,391. The judge approved the settlement and ordered payment of $1,391 within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 815(d) and 820(i)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, and the total proposed penalties were reduced from $3,443 to $1,391.
- Key point: The ALJ approved the negotiated reduction after considering the parties' representations and supporting documentation under the Mine Act's penalty criteria.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) v. OLD BEN COAL
DDATE:
19920115
TTEXT:
Page 2
~150
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Office of Administrative Law Judges
2 Skyline, 10th Floor
5203 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, Virginia 22041
SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. LAKE 91-721
PETITIONER A.C. No. 11-00589-03791
v.
Docket No. LAKE 91-754
OLD BEN COAL COMPANY, A.C. No. 11-00589-03797
RESPONDENT
Docket No. LAKE 92-3
A.C. No. 11-00589-03798
No. 24 Mine
Docket No. LAKE 91-685
A.C. No. 11-02392-03835
No. 25 Mine
Docket No. LAKE 91-487
A.C. No. 11-00590-03834
Docket No. LAKE 91-686
A.C. No. 11-00590-03837
Docket No. LAKE 91-724
A.C. No. 11-00590-03845
No. 26 Mine
SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. LAKE 91-718
PETITIONER A.C. No. 11-00586-03655
v.
Docket No. LAKE 91-748
ZEIGLER COAL COMPANY, A.C. No. 11-00586-03656
RESPONDENT
Docket No. LAKE 91-796
A.C. No. 11-00586-03658
Murdock Mine
Docket No. LAKE 91-728
A.C. No. 11-02408-03644
Page 3
~151
Docket No. LAKE 91-729
A.C. No. 11-02408-03645
Docket No. LAKE 91-730
A.C. No. 11-02408-03646
Docket No. LAKE 91-747
A.C. No. 11-02408-03647
No. 11 Mine
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Appearances: Rafael Alvarez, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor,
Office of the Solicitor, Chicago, Illinois,
for Petitioner;
Gregory S. Keltner, Esq., Old Ben Coal Company,
Fairview Heights, Illinois, for Respondent.
Before: Judge Weisberger
In order to expedite a decision on these cases, it is
ORDERED that they be severed from Docket No. LAKE 91-29 et al.
These cases are before me upon petitions for assessment of
civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 (the Act). On December 16, 1991, subsequent to
a hearing on the merits on another matter, Petitioner moved to
approve settlement agreement and to dismiss the cases. A
reduction in penalties from $3,443 to $1,391 is proposed. I have
considered the representations and documentation submitted in
these cases, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is
appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the
Act.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED,
and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay penalties of $1,391 within
30 days of this order.
Avram Weisberger
Administrative Law Judge
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1992, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.