Essroc Corporation (ALJ decision, March 31, 1992)
Essroc Corporation (FMSHRC LAKE 90-132-DM): Monetary relief ordered after discrimination finding
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1992 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Essroc Corporation operated a cement grinding plant where Clifford Meek had been denied employment after engaging in protected safety-related activity. An earlier decision found discrimination, and this order resolved the remaining question of monetary relief. Judge William Fauver ordered Essroc to pay $24,000 in back pay and interest and $17,065.80 in attorney fees and litigation costs, for a total of $41,065.80 through March 2, 1992. The order also stated that back pay, interest, fees, and costs would continue to accrue until the case and any appeals concluded.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(1)
- Outcome: The request for monetary relief was granted, and Essroc was ordered to pay $41,065.80 plus continuing amounts that accrued after March 2, 1992.
- Key point: After liability was established, the judge entered a final monetary-relief order based on the parties' submissions and the information needed to calculate the award.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CLIFFORD MEEK,
: DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
Complainant :
: Docket No. LAKE 90-132-DM
v. : MSHA Case No. UC MD-90-06
:
ESSROC CORPORATION,
:
Respondent :
FINAL ORDER
Before: Judge Fauver
This is a discrimination proceeding under section 105(c)(1) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.
A decision on liability was entered December 14, 1991, finding that Respondent discriminated against Complainant by refusing to employ him because of protected activities. A supplemental decision was entered on January 31, 1992, denying a motion to dismiss. The matter has been pending a final order on monetary relief.
After extensive exchanges between the parties, and submissions to the judge, of factual positions, documents, legal arguments, and proposals for monetary relief, Complainant filed a revised proposed order for back pay interest, and an attorney fee through March 2, 1992.
After considering this proposal and Respondent's reply, an Order was entered on March 10, 1992, directing the parties to exchange and file by March 30, 1992, certain information needed for a final order for monetary relief. Complainant has filed the additional information, and states that Respondent has not furnished the items specified in the Order, i.e., W-2 statements and quarterly gross wages for its hourly employees at the Middlebranch Plant for the period from February 27, 1990, to March 1, 1992.
The premises considered, Complainant's request on March 30, 1992, for an order granting monetary relief is GRANTED, and it is therefore ORDERED that:
1. Respondent shall pay to Complainant, within 30 days from the date of this Order, the following damages due from February 27, 1990, through March 2, 1992:
Back Pay and Interest - - - - $24,000.00 Attorney Fee and
Litigation costs - - - - $17,065.80
$41,065.80
2. Respondent's liability for back pay, interest and an attorney fee and litigation costs after March 2, 1992, shall continue to accrue until this case including any appeals is concluded.
3. The prior Decisions herein and this Final Order constitute the judge's final disposition of this proceeding.
Distribution:
Robert J. Tscholl, Esq., Roetzel & Andress, 220 Market Avenue, South, Suite 502, Canton, OH 44702 (Certified Mail)
John C. Ross, Esq., Ross & Robertson, P. O. Box 35727, Canton, OH 44735 (Certified Mail)
/fas
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace