FMSHRC ALJ decision Docket LAKE 88-105, LAKE 88-81-R, LAKE 88-82-R Decided March 22, 1989 Settled Judge William Fauver

Old Ben Coal Company

Old Ben Coal Company (FMSHRC LAKE 88-105, LAKE 88-81-R, LAKE 88-82-R): Citation and withdrawal order vacated

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1989 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1989
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary of Labor sought a civil penalty against Old Ben Coal Company and the operator separately challenged the underlying citation and withdrawal order. The cases involved Mine No. 25 and were consolidated for hearing. After testimony and documentary evidence, the parties proposed a disposition allowing the government to vacate the citation and withdrawal order and dismiss all three cases. Judge William Fauver approved that disposition and ordered the cases dismissed.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited provision: 30 U.S.C. § 820(a); no specific safety standard is identified in the decision text.
  • Outcome: The citation and withdrawal order could be vacated, and all three proceedings were dismissed.
  • Key point: The ALJ approved the parties' proposed disposition after the hearing began.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. OLD BEN COAL
DDATE:
19890322
TTEXT:

~415
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.)
Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. LAKE 88-105
PETITIONER A.C. No. 11-02392-03757

      v.                            Mine No. 25

OLD BEN COAL COMPANY,
RESPONDENT

OLD BEN COAL COMPANY, CONTEST PROCEEDINGS
RESPONDENT
Docket No. LAKE 88-81-R
v. Order No. 3031512; 3/4/88

SECRETARY OF LABOR, Docket No. LAKE 88-82-R
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH Citation No. 3031513, 3/4/88
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
RESPONDENT Mine No. 25
Mine ID 11-02392

                         DECISION

Appearances: Miguel J. Carmona, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, for the Secretary of
Labor;
Bronius K. Taoras, Esq., for Old Ben Coal Company.

Before: Judge Fauver

 The Secretary of Labor seeks a civil penalty for an alleged

violation of a safety standard, under 110(a) of the Federal
Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801 et seq. The
operator seeks to vacate the underlying citation and withdrawal
order.

 The cases were consolidated and called for hearing on

February 14, 1989, at St. Louis, Missouri. After the government's
mine inspector testified and documentary evidence was received, a
discussion off the record led to a motion by the parties to
approve a disposition of the cases 1) permitting the government
to vacate the citation and withdrawal order and 2) dismissing all
the cases.

 This Decision confirms my bench decision granting the

parties' motion, for the reasons stated on the record.

~416
ORDER

 WHEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that the Secretary of Labor may

vacate the citation and withdrawal order and based upon such
actions, the above three cases are DISMISSED.

                             William Fauver
                             Administrative Law Judge

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1989, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.