Secretary of Labor v. Eugene C. McPherson

Plain-English summary

The Secretary alleged that Eugene C. McPherson, a mine manager, knowingly authorized a front-end loader with inoperative brakes to operate at the Somerset Lime and Stone Mine. The Secretary proposed a $250 individual penalty under section 110(c) of the Mine Act. McPherson no longer contested the allegation and offered $100 to settle. Judge George A. Koutras approved the settlement after considering the seriousness of the violation, the alleged gross negligence, and McPherson’s personal financial circumstances. The case was dismissed after payment.

Decision snapshot

• Cited standard(s): 30 C.F.R. § 56.9003; 30 U.S.C. § 820(c)
• Outcome: The proposed $250 individual penalty was settled for $100, and the case was dismissed.
• Key point: The judge approved a reduced individual penalty settlement after considering the alleged violation and the respondent’s stated financial circumstances.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. EUGENE MCPHERSON
DDATE:
19870415
TTEXT:

Page 2

~797

          Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
                Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. LAKE 86-101-M
PETITIONER A.C. No. 33-00646-05503-A

     v.                            Somerset Lime & Stone

EUGENE C. MCPHERSON,
RESPONDENT

                    DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Before: Judge Koutras

                        Statement of the Case

 This is a civil penalty proceeding under section 110(c) of

the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
820(c), brought by the petitioner against the respondent Eugene
C. McPherson, mine manager at the Somerset Lime and Stone Mine,
operated by Somerset Lime and Stone, Inc., near Somerset in Perry
County, Ohio. Respondent is charged as an agent of the corporate
mine operator with knowingly authorizing, ordering, or carrying
out said operator's violation of mandatory safety standard 30
C.F.R. 56.9003 cited in a section 107(a)-104(a) Order No.
2513572 issued to the corporate mine operator on May 13, 1985.
The order states as follows: "The brakes were inoperative on the
Hough No. 90 serial number 1037. This front end loader is used in
the stone storage yard to load customer trucks."

 The petitioner states that pursuant to section 110(a) of the

Act, the mine operator was assessed a civil penalty of $500 for
its violation cited in the order, and that it became a final
order of the Commission on September 17, 1985, under MSHA
Assessment Office Case No. 33-004646-05502.

 In this proceeding, a civil penalty of $250 was proposed by

the petitioner against respondent McPherson for his alleged
violation under section 110(c) of the Act. Respondent now

Page 3

~798
advises that he no longer wishes to contest this violation and
has tendered to the petitioner a money order in the amount of
$100 in full settlement of this proceeding.

 This case was scheduled for hearing in Zanesville, Ohio, on

May 7, 1987. However, the petitioner has now filed a motion
pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 2700.30, seeking approval of the proposed
settlement.

                           Discussion

 The petitioner submits that the alleged violation was

serious and that the respondent was grossly negligent in
authorizing the cited end loader to be operated with inadequate
brakes. However, in mitigation, the petitioner states that the
respondent advises that he is now 73 years old, has a heart
problem, is unemployed, and is living off of social security.
Under these special circumstances, and in full consideration of
the civil penalty criteria under section 110(i) of the Act, the
petitioner submits that the settlement of $100 is reasonable and
in the public interest.

Conclusion

 After careful review and consideration of the pleadings,

arguments, and submissions in support of the motion to approve
the proposed settlement of this case, I conclude and find that
the proposed settlement disposition is reasonable and in the
public interest. Accordingly, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 2700.30,
the motion IS GRANTED, and the settlement IS APPROVED.

                             ORDER

 The respondent IS ORDERED to pay a civil penalty in the

amount of $100 in full satisfaction of the alleged violation in
question. Since it appears that the petitioner is in receipt of
said payment, this matter IS DISMISSED.

                                George A. Koutras
                                Administrative Law Judge