Secretary of Labor v. Hillard Bentgen, Grant Macklin, and Russell Heeman (ALJ decision, November 3, 1982)
Hillard Bentgen, Grant Macklin, and Russell Heeman (FMSHRC LAKE 82-27-M): Conclusions in crane brake decision corrected
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1982 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Judge James A. Broderick corrected two conclusions in his October 26, 1982 decision concerning a Grove crane at Ottawa Silica Company's quarry and mill. The corrected first conclusion states that Ottawa Silica violated 30 C.F.R. § 56.9-2 by continuing to operate the crane while its defective brakes remained uncorrected. The corrected second conclusion states that Hillard Bentgen, Grant Macklin, and Russell Heeman were agents of the company during the relevant period. This correction does not state or change a penalty amount.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 56.9-2, cited for continued crane operation with uncorrected defective brakes.
- Outcome: Two conclusions of law in the October 26 decision corrected; no penalty specified in this correction.
- Key point: The correction identifies the company as the violator and the three individual respondents as its agents.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. HILLARD BENTGEN
DDATE:
19821103
TTEXT:
~1898
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Civil Penalty Proceedings
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. LAKE 82-27-M
PETITIONER A/O No. 20-00608-050015-A v.
Docket No. LAKE 82-28-M
HILLARD BENTGEN,
A/O No. 20-00608-05017-A
GRANT MACKLIN,
RUSSELL HEEMAN,
Docket No. LAKE 82-29-M
RESPONDENTS A/O No. 20-00608-050019-A
Ottawa Silica Company
Michigan Division Quarry and Mill
CORRECTIONS TO DECISION ISSUED OCTOBER 26, 1982
On page 5, Conclusion of Law No. 1 should read as follows:
1. Ottawa Silica Company violated the mandatory safety standard contained in 30 C.F.R. 56.9-2 in failing to correct the defective brakes on the Grove cherry picker crane #33 during the period October 31, 1980 to November 25, 1980, while it continued to operate the crane.
On page 5, Conclusion of Law No. 2 should read as follows:
2. Each of the Respondents was an agent of Ottawa Silica Company, a corporation, during the months of October and November, 1980.
James A. Broderick
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace