Hayward Ready Mix Company, Inc. (ALJ decision, January 13, 1982)
Hayward Ready Mix Company, Inc. (FMSHRC LAKE 80-74-M): Three citation case settled for $90
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1982 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
MSHA proposed three $90 penalties against Hayward Ready Mix Company, Inc. under the same electrical standard at its Stress Pit. At the hearing, testimony did not resolve which equipment two of the citations concerned. The parties agreed to withdraw those two citations and pay the full $90 assessment for the remaining one. Judge Forrest E. Stewart independently evaluated the settlement, approved it, and ordered payment within 20 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 56.12-13.
- Outcome: Two citations withdrawn; the third settled for $90, payable within 20 days.
- Key point: The parties resolved the citation identification uncertainty by withdrawing two citations and settling the remaining one at its proposed penalty.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. HAYWARD MIX
DDATE:
19820113
TTEXT:
~41
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Civil Penalty Proceeding
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. LAKE 80-74-M
PETITIONER
A/O No. 47-02554-05002
v.
Stress Pit
HAYWARD READY MIX COMPANY, INC.,
RESPONDENT
DECISION
Appearances: Eva L. Clarke, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Arlington, Virginia, for the Petitioner Ronald G. Poquette, Esq., Betz, LeBarron & Poquette, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, for the Respondent
Before: Judge Stewart
This is a proceeding filed by the Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), under section 110(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 820(a) (hereinafter the Act), to assess civil penalties against Hayward Ready Mix. The contested citations in this case and the disposition are as follows:
30 C.F.R.
Disposition
Number Date Standard Assessment Settlement
295815 8/08/79 56.12-13 $90.00 Withdrawn
295816 8/08/79 56.12-13 $90.00 Withdrawn
295817 8/08/79 56.12-13 $90.00 $90.00
At the onset of the hearing held in the above-captioned proceeding on August 6, 1981, in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, the parties stipulated that the administrative law judge has jurisdiction in this matter; at all times relevant in this matter Inspector Nelson Walter was a duly authorized representative of the Mine Safety and Health Administration; the operator is a small size operator and that the operator will be able to pay penalties if imposed.
After the testimony of the inspector, the issue as to whether two of the citations involved the log washer, the scalper drive motor, or the scalper conveyor drive motor was not resolved. The parties conferred off the record and agreed that two citations would be withdrawn and the full assessed penalty would be paid for the remaining citation.
~42
Based on the testimony of the parties, the information furnished and an independent review and evaluation of the circumstances, I find the settlement proposed is in accord with the provisions of the Act.
ORDER
The settlement negotiated by the parties in the above-captioned proceeding is APPROVED.
Respondent is ORDERED to pay the amount of $90.00 within 20 days of the date of this order.
Forrest E. Stewart
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace