FMSHRC Commission decision Docket LAKE 2023-0265 Decided December 20, 2024 Procedural

Secretary of Labor v. St. Mary's Cement

Secretary of Labor v. St. Marys Cement (FMSHRC LAKE 2023-0265): Paid settlement made reopening moot

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2024, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

MSHA proposed $85,461 in penalties, and St. Marys timely contested them before agreeing to a settlement that reduced the amount to $67,025. The operator paid the full settlement amount after receiving a delinquency notice. St. Marys nevertheless moved to reopen, but it identified no mistake or defect in the settlement and the Secretary said the request was moot. The Commission agreed, ruled the reopening motion moot, and left the ALJ's January 4, 2024 settlement order final.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
  • Outcome: The motion to reopen was declared moot, and the ALJ's settlement order remained final.
  • Key point: A timely contested and fully paid settlement was not reopened when the operator identified no mistake or other defect.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1710

SECRETARY OF LABOR

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v.

ST. MARYS CEMENT

Docket No. LAKE 2023-0265

A.C. No. 20-02434-582956

BEFORE: Jordan, Chair; Baker and Marvit, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2018) (“Mine Act”). On March 8, 2024, the Commission received from St. Marys Cement (“St. Marys”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had appeared to become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

On August 16, 2023, the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) proposed penalties in the amount of $85,461 against St. Marys. On August 30, 2023, the operator filed a timely contest of the citations. The Secretary subsequently filed a Petition for Assessment of Penalty.

On January 3, 2024, the Secretary filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement involving of all of the citations listed in the proposed assessment. On January 4, 2024, a Commission Administrative Law Judge issued an order, granting the settlement motion, reducing the penalties assessed against St. Marys from $85,461 to $67,025, and ordering the operator to pay $67,025 within 30 days. On March 21, 2024, MSHA sent the operator a delinquency notice seeking payment of $67,025. On March 29, 2024, MSHA received the amount of $67,025 from the operator.

St. Marys filed a motion seeking to reopen the penalties explaining in part that it discovered the delinquency on March 7, 2024, when reviewing the public Data Retrieval System maintained by MSHA. The Secretary states that St. Marys’ motion is moot since the penalties have been paid.

Although St. Marys has moved to reopen this case, the record is clear that the proposed penalty assessment was timely contested. The Secretary filed its petition with the Commission, the case was assigned to an Administrative Law Judge, and the parties negotiated a good faith settlement.[1] St. Marys has not identified any mistakes or other deficiencies with the settlement warranting reopening.

Accordingly, the operator’s motion to reopen is moot. See Olmos Contracting 1, LLC, 39 FMSHRC 2015, 2019 (Nov. 2017). The ALJ’s January 4, 2024 Order remains final.

/s/ Mary Lu Jordan

Mary Lu Jordan, Chair

/s/ Timothy J. Baker

Timothy J. Baker, Commissioner

/s/ Moshe Z. Marvit

Moshe Z. Marvit, Commissioner

Distribution:

Adele L. Abrams, Esq.

Law Office of Adele L. Abrams, P.C.

4740 Corridor Place, Suite D

Beltsville, MD 20705

[email protected]

April Nelson, Esq.

Associate Solicitor

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

Division of Mine Safety and Health

201 12th Street South, Suite 401

Arlington, VA 22202

[email protected]

Emily Toler Scott, Esq.

Counsel for Appellate Litigation

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

Division of Mine Safety and Health

201 12th Street South, Suite 401

Arlington, VA 22202

[email protected]

Melanie Garris USDOL/MSHA, OAASEI/CPCO 201 12th Street South, Suite 401 Arlington, VA 22202 [email protected]

Chief Administrative Law Judge Glynn F. Voisin Federal Mine Safety Health Review Commission

Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 520N Washington, DC 20004-1710 [email protected]

[1] We note that the associated civil penalties were paid in full. In the context of a settlement agreement, this appears to have been an intentional act on the art of St. Marys, not a mistake.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 2024. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.