Secretary of Labor v. Prairie State Generating Company, LLC (Commission decision, March 5, 2018)
Secretary of Labor v. Prairie State Generating Company, LLC (FMSHRC LAKE 2017-158): Timely mailed contest prevented finality
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2018, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Prairie State Generating received a proposed penalty assessment and mailed its notice of contest within the 30-day period. Postal tracking showed that MSHA's Arlington office received the contest two days later, but MSHA later sent a delinquency notice and treated the assessment as final. Prairie State promptly contacted MSHA and argued that the agency had misplaced the filing. The Secretary did not oppose the request or dispute the tracking evidence. The Commission held that timely notice prevented the assessment from ever becoming final, treated the motion to reopen as moot, and remanded the case for further proceedings.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
- Outcome: The assessment was held not to be final, the reopening motion was moot, and the case was remanded.
- Key point: An operator does not need Rule 60(b) relief when reliable evidence shows that MSHA received a timely notice of contest.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY
OF LABOR,
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)
v.
PRAIRIE
STATE GENERATING
COMPANY,
LLC
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket
No. LAKE 2017-158
A.C.
No. 11-03193-418476
BEFORE: Althen,
Acting Chairman; Jordan, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE
COMMISSION:
This
matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On February 13, 2017, the Commission received from Prairie State Generating Company, LLC (“Prairie State”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that appeared to have become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Records
of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) indicate that the proposed assessment was mailed to Prairie State on August 8, 2016. The proposed assessment became a final order of the Commission on or about September 7, 2016, when it appeared that the operator had not filed a Notice of Contest within 30 days. [1]
Prairie State asserts that it timely
contested the proposed assessment on September 6, 2016. Prairie State provided copies of USPS tracking documents showing that its contest was mailed on September 6, 2016 and delivered to MSHA’s Arlington, Virginia office on September 8, 2016. On December 16, 2016, the Secretary issued a delinquency notice to the operator. On December 22, 2016, the operator promptly contacted MSHA regarding the alleged delinquency. Prairie State posits that the Secretary may have misplaced the contest after receipt. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen nor does he challenge the assertion that the contest was misplaced.
Having reviewed Prairie State’s request and the Secretary’s response, we conclude that the proposed penalty assessment did not become a final order of the Commission because the operator timely contested the proposed assessment. Section 105(a) states that if an operator “fails to notify the Secretary that he intends to contest the . . . proposed assessment of penalty . . . the citation and the proposed assessment of penalty shall be deemed a final order of the Commission.” 30 U.S.C. § 815(a). Here, Prairie State notified the Secretary of the contest. This obviates any need to invoke Rule 60(b). Accordingly, the operator’s motion to reopen is moot, and this case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.
/s/ William I. Althen
William I. Althen, Acting Chairman
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
/s/ Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
R.
Henry Moore, Esq.
Arthur
M. Wolfson, Esq.
Jackson
Kelly, PLLC
Three
Gateway Center
Suite
1500
401
Liberty Ave.
Pittsburgh,
PA 15222
Todd
A. Grounds
Safety
Manager
Prairie
State Generating Company, LLC
4274
Country Hwy 12
Marissa,
IL 62257
Ali
Beydoun, Esq.
Office
of the Solicitor
U.S.
Department of Labor
201
12th St. South, Suite 401
Arlington,
VA 22202-5450
Chief
Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal
Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331
Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite 520N
Washington,
DC 20004-1710
Melanie
Garris
Office
of Civil Penalty Compliance
Mine
Safety and Health Administration
U.S.
Department of Labor
201
12th St. South, Suite 500
Arlington,
VA 22202-5450
[1]
MSHA represents in its December 16, 2016 delinquency letter that proposed assessment became a final order on October 31, 2016. The Secretary has not provided the Commission with any explanation as to why MSHA considered the final order date to be more than four months after the proposed assessment was mailed to the operator. Regardless of this discrepancy in the record, the Secretary does not contest Prairie State’s assertion that it filed is contest on September 6, 2017, prior to any possible final order date.
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace