Secretary of Labor v. Northshore Mining Company, Roger Peterson, and Matthew Zimmer (Commission decision, May 30, 2024)

Secretary of Labor v. Northshore Mining Company (FMSHRC LAKE 2017-0248): Court mandate sent flagrant penalty back for reassessment

Decision type
Commission decision
Dockets
LAKE 2017-0248, LAKE 2017-0224, LAKE 2018-0146, LAKE 2018-0141
Decided
May 30, 2024
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-07-31

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2024, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Commission had previously upheld reckless-disregard and unwarrantable-failure findings, deleted a flagrant designation, and rejected individual liability for two Northshore Mining employees. The Eighth Circuit reversed the Commission on the flagrant and individual-liability issues. Its mandate directed consideration of whether the penalty for the flagrant violation of the travelway standard should be reassessed. The Commission therefore remanded the matter to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for that penalty determination.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 56.11002
  • Outcome: The case was remanded for consideration of reassessing the penalty for the flagrant violation in Order No. 8897220.
  • Key point: After the court restored the flagrant designation, the remaining agency task was to determine whether the penalty should change.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1710

SECRETARY OF
LABOR, :

MINE SAFETY AND
HEALTH :

ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA) :

                                                                     :

                    v.
                                         :          Docket Nos. LAKE 2017-0248

                                                                     :

LAKE 2017-0224

                                                                     :

LAKE 2018-0146

                                                                     :

LAKE 2018-0141

                                                                     :

                                                                     :

NORTHSHORE MINING
COMPANY, :

ROGER PETERSON,
employed by :

NORTHSHORE MIINING
COMPANY, and :

MATTHEW ZIMMER,
employed by :

NORTHSHORE MINING
COMPANY :

BEFORE: Jordan,
Chair; Althen, Rajkovich, Baker, and Marvit, Commissioners

DECISION

BY THE COMMISSION:

These
proceedings arise under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2018) (“Mine Act” or “Act”) from Cross Petitions for Discretionary Review filed by the parties. On January 21, 2021, the Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge’s findings of reckless disregard and unwarrantable failure designations, affirmed the Judge’s deletion of a flagrant designation, and reversed the Judge’s findings of individual liability under section 110(c) of the Act. 30 U.S.C. § 820(c).

On
August 22, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued a decision reversing the Commission’s decision on the issues of the flagrant designation and individual liability. The court remanded the case “for consideration of whether the penalty amount for [the flagrant violation of 30 C.F.R. 56.11002 set forth in Order No. 8897220] should be reassessed.” The Court subsequently issued its mandate on October 13, 2022.

In
accordance with the court’s decision, the Commission hereby remands this matter to the Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge for consideration of whether the penalty amount for the flagrant violation of 30 C.F.R. 56.11002 set forth in Order No. 8897220 should be reassessed.

/s/ Mary Lu
Jordan

Mary Lu Jordan, Chair

/s/ William I. Althen

William I. Althen, Commissioner

/s/ Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.

Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr., Commissioner

/s/ Timothy J. Baker

Timothy J. Baker, Commissioner

/s/ Moshe Z. Marvit

Moshe
Z. Marvit, Commissioner

Distribution:

R. Henry Moore,
Esq.

Fisher &
Phillips LLP

Six PPG Place,
Suite 830

Pittsburgh, PA
15222

[email protected]

Emily
Toler Scott, Esq.

Division
of Mine Safety and Health

Office
of the Solicitor

U.S.
Department of Labor

201
12th Street South – Suite 401

Arlington,
VA 22202-5450

[email protected]

April
Nelson, Esq.

Office
of the Solicitor

U.S.
Department of Labor

201
12th St. South-Suite 401

Arlington,
VA 22202-5450

[email protected]

Melanie
Garris

Office
of Civil Penalty Compliance, MSHA

U.S.
Department of Labor

201
12th Street South, Suite 401

Arlington,
VA 22202-5450

[email protected]

Chief
Administrative Law Judge Glynn F. Voisin

Federal Mine Safety Health Review Commission

1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 520N

Washington, DC 20004-1710

[email protected]

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace