Secretary of Labor v. South Central Coal Indiana, LLC (Commission decision, January 31, 2017)
Secretary of Labor v. South Central Coal Indiana, LLC (FMSHRC LAKE 2015-23): Default vacated where filings never reached the operator's attorney
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2017, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
South Central Coal Indiana did not answer a penalty petition, so the Chief ALJ issued a show cause order that became a default order when no answer arrived within 30 days. The company asked the Commission to reopen, explaining that it had hired an outside attorney for MSHA matters and that an office move caused it to miss deadlines. It also said it had assigned an employee to track Commission filings going forward. The Secretary did not oppose reopening. The Commission granted relief, noting that neither the penalty petition nor the show cause order had been sent to the attorney the company designated, and that the company moved quickly once it learned of the default. The default order was vacated and the case sent back to the Chief ALJ.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) and (d)(2)(A)(i); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b), 2700.69(b), and 2700.70(a)
- Outcome: The proceeding was reopened, the default order was vacated, and the case was remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge.
- Key point: Default is a harsh remedy, and failing to serve the operator's designated attorney supports reopening under Rule 60(b) standards.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY
OF LABOR,
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)
v.
SOUTH
CENTRAL COAL
INDIANA,
LLC
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket
No. LAKE 2015-23
A.C.
No. 12-02431-360684
BEFORE: Althen,
Acting Chairman; Jordan, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY
THE COMMISSION:
This
matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On July 21, 2015, the Commission received from South Central Coal Indiana, LLC (“South Central”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment proceeding and relieve it from the Default Order entered against it.
On
May 4, 2015, the Chief Administrative Law Judge issued an Order to Show Cause in response to South Central’s failure to timely answer the Secretary of Labor’s November 13, 2014 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty. By its terms, the Order to Show Cause was deemed a Default Order on June 4, 2015, when it appeared that the operator had not filed an answer within 30 days.
South Central asserts that it had
retained an outside attorney to address MSHA matters at its mine. The operator states that it failed to timely respond to the Order to Show Cause because it was in the process of moving offices, which caused the operator to miss some deadlines. South Central further states that it does not expect to miss deadlines in the future since it does not expect to move its office again, and that it has also asked one of its employees to take specific responsibility to ensure timely responses to MSHA filings and Commission orders in the future. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen.
The
Judge’s jurisdiction in this matter terminated when the default occurred. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(b). Under the Mine Act and the Commission’s procedural rules, relief from a judge’s decision may be sought by filing a petition for discretionary review within 30 days of its issuance. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)(A)(i); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.70(a). If the Commission does not direct review within 40 days of a decision’s issuance, it becomes a final decision of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). Consequently, the Judge’s order here has become a final decision of the Commission.
In
evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which the Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); Jim Walter Res., Inc. , 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993). We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits will be permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc. , 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
Having reviewed South Central’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice, we hereby reopen the proceeding and vacate the Default Order. In particular, we note that the Secretary’s Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty was not sent to the attorney designated by South Central, and that the Order to Show Cause likewise was not sent to the attorney. When South Central discovered the default, it quickly requested reopening.
Accordingly,
this case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.
/s/ William I. Althen
William I. Althen, Acting Chairman
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
/s/ Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
Craig
A. Beck
c/o
South Central Coal Indiana LLC
22279
Hwy 271
P.O.
Box 268
Spiro,
OK 74959
W.
Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office
of the Solicitor
U.S.
Department of Labor
201
12th St. South, Suite 500
Arlington,
VA 22202-5450
Chief
Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal
Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331
Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite 520N
Washington,
DC 20004-1710
Melanie
Garris
Office
of Civil Penalty Compliance
Mine
Safety and Health Administration
U.S.
Department of Labor
201
12th St. South, Suite 500
Arlington,
VA 22202-5450
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace