Secretary of Labor on behalf of Peter L. Dunne v. Vulcan Construction Materials, LP (Commission decision, July 14, 2011)
Secretary of Labor on behalf of Peter L. Dunne v. Vulcan Construction Materials, LP (FMSHRC LAKE 2011-327-DM): Temporary economic reinstatement continued
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2011, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Peter L. Dunne received temporary economic reinstatement after Vulcan Construction Materials discharged him and MSHA investigated his discrimination complaint. MSHA later concluded that no discrimination occurred, but Dunne filed his own section 105(c)(3) complaint. The Commission affirmed the judge's refusal to dissolve temporary reinstatement while that individual complaint remained pending, following its decision in Secretary of Labor on behalf of Gray v. North Fork Coal Corp. Commissioner Robert F. Cohen concurred under his separate Gray reasoning, while Commissioners Michael F. Duffy and Michael G. Young dissented and would have ended reinstatement.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 815(c)(2) and 815(c)(3)
- Outcome: The order denying Vulcan Materials' motion to dissolve temporary economic reinstatement was affirmed.
- Key point: Temporary reinstatement continues while a miner's timely individual discrimination complaint remains pending even after MSHA declines to prosecute.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
July 14, 2011
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
VULCAN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, LP
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. LAKE 2011-327-DM
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners
DECISION
BY: Jordan, Chairman, and Nakamura, Commissioner
This temporary reinstatement proceeding arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act” or “Act”). Pursuant to section 105(c)(2) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(2), and a settlement agreement among the parties, Administrative Law Judge Janet Harner ordered miner Peter L. Dunne temporarily reinstated, on an economic basis, at Vulcan Construction Materials, LP (“Vulcan Materials”) after he had been discharged by the operator. Unpublished Order, dated Jan. 28, 2011 (ALJ). The Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”), by letter dated February 15, 2011, notified Dunne that it had concluded he had not been discriminated against. Consistent with the instructions included in MSHA’s letter, on March 16, 2011, Dunne filed his own discrimination complaint pursuant to section 105(c)(3), 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3). It is presently pending before Commission Administrative Law Judge L. Zane Gill in Dunne v. Vulcan Construction Materials, LP, Docket No. LAKE 2011-457-DM.
On April 28, 2011, Vulcan Materials moved in Docket No. LAKE 2011-457-DM to dissolve the order of temporary reinstatement. The Secretary of Labor filed a response in opposition, and on June 7, 2011, Judge Gill issued an order denying the motion to dissolve. On July 7, 2011, Vulcan Materials filed a Petition for Discretionary Review, which the Commission has granted.
Consistent with our opinion in Secretary of Labor on behalf of Gray v. North Fork Coal Corp., 33 FMSHRC 27, 33-44 (Jan. 2011), we affirm the judge’s order denying Vulcan Materials’ motion to dissolve the temporary reinstatement order.
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Commissioner Cohen, concurring:
Consistent with my opinion in Secretary of Labor on behalf of Gray v. North Fork Coal Corp., 33 FMSHRC 27, 45-52 (Jan. 2011), I agree that the judge’s order denying the motion to dissolve the temporary reinstatement order should be affirmed.
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
Commissioners Duffy and Young, dissenting:
Consistent with our opinion in Secretary of Labor on behalf of Gray v. North Fork Coal Corp., 33 FMSHRC 27, 53-58 (Jan. 2011), we disagree that the judge’s order denying the motion to dissolve the temporary reinstatement order should be affirmed, and instead would reverse the judge’s order denying the motion and dissolve the temporary reinstatement order.
Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
Distribution
Ruben R. Chapa, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
230 S. Dearborn St., 8th Floor
Chicago, IL 60604
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
William K. Doran, Esq.
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
2400 N Street, N.W., 5th Floor
Washington, DC 20037
Peter L. Dunne
6691 Church Street
Hanover Park, IL 60133
Chad Murphy
Business Representative
Local 150 Operating Engineers
2000 Bolton Blvd.
Barlett, IL 60103
Administrative Law Judge Janet Harner
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
Office of Administrative Law Judges
7 Parkway Center
875 Greentree Road, Suite 290
Pittsburgh, PA 15220
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace