Fox Ridge Stone Co., LLC

Plain-English summary

Fox Ridge Stone asked the Commission to reopen a default order involving one specially assessed citation. The operator had timely contested all assessments from the inspection but later failed to answer penalty petitions in two related dockets. It sent a response to the show-cause orders without writing either docket number on the letter. After comparing both files, the Commission found that Fox Ridge intended the response to cover this docket as well. It reopened the case and remanded it for further proceedings.

Decision snapshot

• Cited provisions: 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b), 2700.69(b), and 2700.70(a); 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1)
• Outcome: The final default order was reopened and the matter was remanded.
• Key point: A timely but undocketed response may prevent default when the related records show that the operator intended it to answer both show-cause orders.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-1710

December 14, 2012

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH 

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) 

v.

FOX RIDGE STONE CO., LLC

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. LAKE 2010-285-M

A.C. No. 11-02646-206210

BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Young and Nakamura, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On December 6, 2011, the Commission received from Fox
Ridge Stone Co., LLC (“Fox Ridge”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment
proceeding and relieve it from the order of default entered against it.

On March 16, 2011, Chief Administrative Law Judge Lesnick issued an Order to Show
Cause which by its terms became a Default Order if the operator did not file an answer within 30
days. This Order to Show Cause was issued in response to Fox Ridge’s failure to answer the
Secretary’s February 9, 2010 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty. The record in this docket
does not show a response from the operator.

The judge’s jurisdiction in this matter terminated when the default occurred. 29 C.F.R.
§ 2700.69(b). Under the Mine Act and the Commission’s procedural rules, relief from a judge’s
decision may be sought by filing a petition for discretionary review within 30 days of its
issuance. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)(A)(i); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.70(a). If the Commission does not
direct review within 40 days of a decision’s issuance, it becomes a final decision of the
Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). Consequently, the judge’s order here has become a final
decision of the Commission.

In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule
60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled
to relief from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable
neglect. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as
practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782,
786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if
the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case
may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs.,
Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).

Fox Ridge asserts that it contested the penalty assessment on December 21, 2009, and
stated that the remaining penalties from this mine inspection were contested on November 24,
2009, and assigned docket No. LAKE 2010-187-M. Fox Ridge enclosed copies of these letters.

The Secretary opposes the request to reopen and notes that the operator fails to establish
exceptional circumstances that warrant reopening. The Secretary states that Fox Ridge did not
answer the penalty petition, nor the Show Cause Order. MSHA sent Fox Ridge a delinquency
notice on August 19, 2011, and the case was referred to the Department of Treasury for
collection on October 13, 2011. The Secretary further states that Fox Ridge does not explain
why it failed to acknowledge or answer any of these documents, although they were mailed to its
address of record.

Review of the record in Docket No. LAKE 2010-285-M, the docket at issue here,
together with the Commission’s file in Docket No. LAKE 2010-187-M reveals that Fox Ridge
timely contested all of the proposed assessments arising out of an MSHA inspection on
September 16-17, 2009. The proposed assessments were contained in two separate dockets, with
28 citations assigned to Docket No. LAKE 2010-187-M and one citation, which was the subject
of a Special Assessment, assigned to Docket No. LAKE 2010-285-M. Fox Ridge failed to
respond to the Secretary’s Petitions for Assessment of Civil Penalty in either docket. On March
16, 2011, Chief Judge Lesnick issued separate (but identical except for the docket numbers)
Orders to Show Cause in both dockets. On March 24, 2011, Fox Ridge sent a letter to the
Commission responding to the Order to Show Cause, and explaining Fox Ridge’s reasons for
disagreeing with the citations and penalties.

It appears that Fox Ridge intended that its March
24, 2011 letter (which had no docket number written on it) constitute a response to the Order to
Show Cause in Docket No. LAKE 2010-285-M, as well as LAKE 2010-187-M.

Having reviewed Fox Ridge’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interests of
justice, we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for
further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R.
Part 2700.

/s/ Mary Lu Jordan

Mary Lu Jordan, Chair

/s/Michael G. Young

Michael G. Young, Commissioner

/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura

Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner

Distribution:

Joseph Hamman

Donald Hamman

Fox Ridge Stone Co., LLC

6110 Rte 71

Oswego, IL 60543

[email protected]

W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296

Melanie Garris

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance

MSHA

U.S. Dept. Of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor

Arlington, VA 22209-3939

Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue, N. W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001-2021