Wabash Mine Holding Co. (ALJ decision, March 4, 2005)
Wabash Mine Holding Co. (FMSHRC LAKE 2004-147): Caption modified and penalty motion deferred
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2005 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The judge corrected the respondent's name from Foundation Midwest Holding Company to Wabash Mine Holding Company, an affiliated operator. The Secretary did not oppose the caption change. Wabash had also asked to vacate proposed penalties under the Mine Act's reasonable-time requirement, but the judge found that request premature because liability had not yet been established. The judge deferred ruling until after the scheduled hearing and allowed the parties to address the issue in their post-hearing briefs.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
- Outcome: The caption was modified, and ruling on the motion to vacate proposed penalties was deferred.
- Key point: The judge postponed the reasonable-time challenge until after the hearing because liability had not yet been established.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
WABASH MINE HOLDING CO. -- March 4, 2005
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
601 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Suite 9500
Washington, DC 20001
March 4, 2005
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. LAKE 2004-147
Petitioner : A.C. No. 11-00877-34581
:
v. :
:
WABASH MINE HOLDING CO., : Wabash Mine
Respondent :
ORDER MODIFYING CAPTION
AND
DEFERRING ON RULING ON MOTION
TO VACATE CIVIL PENALTIES
The respondent has moved to modify the captioned proceeding to reflect the correct mine operator name is Wabash Mine Holding Company (Wabash). Foundation Midwest Holding Company, the previously named respondent in this matter, is an affiliate of Wabash. The Secretary does not oppose Wabash's motion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the captioned proceeding IS MODIFIED to reflect Wabash Mine Holding Company as the named respondent.
This matter is scheduled for hearing on May 18, 2005. Relying on the Commission's decision in Twentymile Coal Co., 26 FMSHRC 666 (Aug. 2004), appeal docketed, No. 04-1292 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 30, 2004), Wabash filed a motion to vacate the proposed penalties asserting they were not proposed by the Secretary "within a reasonable time" as specified in Section 105(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 815(a). The Secretary opposes Wabash's motion. During a March 3, 2005, telephone conference I advised counsel for the parties that I considered the motion to be premature because liability has not been established. Counsel were advised that I would defer ruling on the motion until after the hearing and that they would be afforded with the opportunity to further address the "reasonable time" issue in their post-hearing briefs.
Jerold Feldman
Administrative Law Judge
(202) 434-9967
Distribution: (Certified Mail)
Christine M. Kassak Smith, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor 230 S. Dearborn Street, 8th Fl., Chicago, IL 60604
R. Henry Moore, Esq., Jackson Kelly, PLLC, Three Gateway Center, Suite 1340, 401 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15222
/hs
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace