Hibbing Taconite Company (ALJ decision, August 4, 2000)

Hibbing Taconite Company (FMSHRC LAKE 2000-41-DM): Discrimination settlement approved

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
LAKE 2000-41-DM, LAKE 2000-42-DM, LAKE 2000-43-DM
Decided
August 4, 2000
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-11
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2000 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2000
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final order, not Commission precedent
This decision by a FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge became the final decision of the Commission 40 days after issuance because the Commission did not direct review (30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1)). It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary alleged that Hibbing Taconite disciplined Dwayne H. Hemenway, Allen P. Bluemke, and Robert R. Williams for allegedly misusing rights under Article XIV of their basic labor agreement. The parties reached a settlement during the merits hearing. Hibbing Taconite agreed to expunge the letters of discipline and related computer-log references, post the settlement materials for 30 days, and pay a $100 civil penalty. Judge Jacqueline R. Bulluck found the settlement appropriate and in the public interest and ordered dismissal after compliance.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3)
  • Outcome: The discrimination settlement was approved, with expungement, posting, a $100 penalty, and dismissal after compliance.
  • Key point: The approved settlement removed the discipline records and resolved the three discrimination proceedings without a merits finding.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
August 4, 2000

SECRETARY OF LABOR, MSHA
: DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDINGS
on behalf of
:
DWAYNE H. HEMENWAY,
: Docket No. LAKE 2000-41-DM
ALLEN P. BLUEMKE, and
: Docket No. LAKE 2000-42-DM
ROBERT R. WILLIAMS
: Docket No. LAKE 2000-43-DM
Complainants
:
: NC MD 99-10
v. : NC MD 99-11
: NC MD 99-12
HIBBING TACONITE COMPANY
:
Respondent
: Mine ID 21-01600
: Hibbing Mine

DECISION

Appearances: Rafael Alvarez, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Chicago, Illinois for Complainants;
R. Henry Moore, Esq., Buchanan Ingersoll, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania for Respondent.

Before: Judge Bulluck

These cases concern discrimination proceedings filed pursuant to Section 105(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3). The Secretary, on behalf of Hemenway, Bluemke and Williams, alleges that the miners were unlawfully disciplined on March 5, 1999, for alleged misuse of their Article XIV (Basic Labor Agreement) rights, and seeks expungement of their personnel files of letters of reprimand and all references to the subject protected activity. Additionally, the Secretary seeks orders directing Hibbing Taconite to cease and desist discriminatory activities directed at all miners, posting of a notice of violation, and imposition of a $3,000.00 civil penalty.

A hearing on the merits was convened on July 17, 2000, in Duluth, Minnesota, during the course of which the parties engaged in discussions and negotiated a settlement. Under the terms of the agreement, Hibbing Taconite is required to take the following action:

1. expunge the personnel files of Hemenway, Bluemke and Williams of letters of discipline;
2. delete any reference to the letters of discipline from the discipline log maintained in the computer record keeping system;

969


Page 2

3. post the Motion to Dismiss and Approve Settlement and this Order for 30 days; and
4. pay a civil penalty in the amount of $100.00 for the discrimination violation.

The settlement was approved at hearing, and that determination is hereby confirmed.

ORDER

The settlement is appropriate and is in the public interest. WHEREFORE, the approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Hibbing Taconite comply with terms of the settlement agreement, as set forth above, and pay a civil penalty of $100.00 within 30 days of the date of this decision. Upon Hibbing Taconite's compliance with all terms of settlement, these proceedings are DISMISSED.

Jacqueline R. Bulluck
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution: (certified mail)

Rafael Alvarez, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 230 S. Dearborn St., 8th Floor, Chicago, IL 60604

Henry Moore, Esq., Buchanan Ingersoll, One Oxford Centre, 301 Grant Street, 20th Floor, Pittsburgh, PA 15219-1410

\nt

970

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace