Freeman United Coal Company
Freeman United Coal Company (FMSHRC LAKE 2000-102-R, LAKE 2000-103-R, LAKE 2000-104-R, and LAKE 2000-105-R): Contest proceedings treated as finally disposed
What's the rule today?
This ALJ decision was superseded by the Commission's decision in the same case. Ezel starts from the controlling decision and answers your situation under current law, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Freeman United contested four citations at the Crown II Mine, but the contests did not include a request to assess civil penalties. After the Commission remanded the proceedings for a penalty assessment, Judge Gary Melick held that the Commission had no jurisdiction to impose a penalty in these contest cases because the Secretary had not filed a penalty petition. He therefore treated the Commission's prior decision as the final disposition of the proceedings.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(d)
- Outcome: The contest proceedings were treated as finally disposed after the Commission's prior decision.
- Key point: A contest proceeding that challenges citation validity without a penalty petition cannot be used to assess a civil penalty after remand.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, Suite 1000
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
July 5, 2002
FREEMAN UNITED COAL COMPANY, : CONTEST PROCEEDINGS
:
Contestant : Docket No. LAKE 2000-102-R
: Citation No. 7584882; 6/22/2000
:
: Docket No. LAKE 2000-103-R
v. : Citation No. 7584883; 6/22/2000
:
: Docket No. LAKE 2000-104-R
: Citation No. 7584884; 6/22/2000
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR : Docket No. LAKE 2000-105-R
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH : Citation No. 7584885; 6/22/2000
ADMINISTRATION, (MSHA), :
Respondent : Crown II Mine
: Mine ID 11-02236
DECISION
Before: Judge Melick
On June 24, 2002, a Commission majority remanded these Contest Proceedings for a civil
penalty assessment. However these cases were filed with this Commission pursuant to Section
105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq., (1994), the
“Act,” to challenge only the validity of the four “Section 104(a)” citations at bar. No civil
penalty has been sought in these contest cases and the Secretary of Labor has not, to date, filed
any petition or other pleading seeking any civil penalty for the violations charged in these
citations. Under the circumstances, this Commission is without jurisdiction in these contest
cases to assess a civil penalty.
Accordingly, the Commission majority’s decision on June 24, 2002, effectively
dismissing these Contest Proceedings, must be considered the final disposition of these
proceedings.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
705
Page 2
Distribution: (Certified Mail)
Timothy M. Biddle, Esq., Edward Green, Esq., Crowell & Moring, LLP, 1001 Pennsylvania
Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20004
Sheila Cronan, Esq., & James Crawford, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor,
4015 Wilson Blvd., Suite 400, Arlington, VA 22203
\mca
706
Find out what applies today
This decision wasn't the final word: the Commission reviewed the case, and its decision is the one that controls. Ezel starts from the controlling decision and answers your specific situation under current law, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.