FMSHRC ALJ decision Docket LAKE 2000-102-R, LAKE 2000-103-R, LAKE 2000-104-R, LAKE 2000-105-R Decided July 5, 2002 Procedural Judge Gary Melick

Freeman United Coal Company

Freeman United Coal Company (FMSHRC LAKE 2000-102-R, LAKE 2000-103-R, LAKE 2000-104-R, and LAKE 2000-105-R): Contest proceedings treated as finally disposed

What's the rule today?

This ALJ decision was superseded by the Commission's decision in the same case. Ezel starts from the controlling decision and answers your situation under current law, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2002
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
ALJ decision, later reviewed by the Commission
This decision was issued by an FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge, but it was not the final word in the case: the Commission directed review, and the Commission's decision is the one citable as precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Freeman United contested four citations at the Crown II Mine, but the contests did not include a request to assess civil penalties. After the Commission remanded the proceedings for a penalty assessment, Judge Gary Melick held that the Commission had no jurisdiction to impose a penalty in these contest cases because the Secretary had not filed a penalty petition. He therefore treated the Commission's prior decision as the final disposition of the proceedings.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(d)
  • Outcome: The contest proceedings were treated as finally disposed after the Commission's prior decision.
  • Key point: A contest proceeding that challenges citation validity without a penalty petition cannot be used to assess a civil penalty after remand.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, Suite 1000
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041

                                       July 5, 2002

FREEMAN UNITED COAL COMPANY, : CONTEST PROCEEDINGS
:
Contestant : Docket No. LAKE 2000-102-R
: Citation No. 7584882; 6/22/2000
:
: Docket No. LAKE 2000-103-R
v. : Citation No. 7584883; 6/22/2000
:
: Docket No. LAKE 2000-104-R
: Citation No. 7584884; 6/22/2000
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR : Docket No. LAKE 2000-105-R
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH : Citation No. 7584885; 6/22/2000
ADMINISTRATION, (MSHA), :
Respondent : Crown II Mine
: Mine ID 11-02236

                                      DECISION

Before: Judge Melick

    On June 24, 2002, a Commission majority remanded these Contest Proceedings for a civil

penalty assessment. However these cases were filed with this Commission pursuant to Section
105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq., (1994), the
“Act,” to challenge only the validity of the four “Section 104(a)” citations at bar. No civil
penalty has been sought in these contest cases and the Secretary of Labor has not, to date, filed
any petition or other pleading seeking any civil penalty for the violations charged in these
citations. Under the circumstances, this Commission is without jurisdiction in these contest
cases to assess a civil penalty.

   Accordingly, the Commission majority’s decision on June 24, 2002, effectively

dismissing these Contest Proceedings, must be considered the final disposition of these
proceedings.

                                         Gary Melick
                                         Administrative Law Judge

                                           705

Page 2

Distribution: (Certified Mail)

Timothy M. Biddle, Esq., Edward Green, Esq., Crowell & Moring, LLP, 1001 Pennsylvania
Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20004

Sheila Cronan, Esq., & James Crawford, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor,
4015 Wilson Blvd., Suite 400, Arlington, VA 22203

\mca

                                         706

Find out what applies today

This decision wasn't the final word: the Commission reviewed the case, and its decision is the one that controls. Ezel starts from the controlling decision and answers your specific situation under current law, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.