J & C Mining, L.L.C. (ALJ decision, February 22, 1999)

Secretary of Labor v. J & C Mining, L.L.C. (FMSHRC KENT 99-61-D): Discrimination case settled for $1,000

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
KENT 99-61-D
Decided
February 22, 1999
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-11
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1999 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1999
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary of Labor brought a discrimination case on behalf of Paul Middleton against J & C Mining under section 105(c) of the Mine Act. The parties reached a settlement after the hearing had begun and presented its terms on the record. Judge Avram Weisberger approved the settlement, ordered J & C Mining to pay a $1,000 civil penalty, and required the parties to follow all settlement terms. The case was sealed and dismissed with prejudice.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, J & C Mining was ordered to pay $1,000, and the case was dismissed with prejudice.
  • Key point: The judge found the settlement fair and just and made its terms enforceable through the dismissal order.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF A D M INISTRA TIV E LA W JUDGES 2 SK YLINE, 10 th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIK E
FA LLS CHURCH, V IRGINIA 22041

February 22, 1999

SECRETARY OF LABOR, : DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. KENT 99-61-D
on behalf of PAUL MIDDLETON,
:
Complainant : BARB CD 98-19
v. :
: Mine No. 1
J & C MINING, L.L.C., : Mine ID 15-17707
Respondent
:

DECISION

Appearances: Brian W. Dougherty, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, Nashville, Tennessee, for the Secretary;
Susan C. Lawson, Esq., Lawson & Lawson, Harlan, Kentucky, for the Respondent.

Before: Judge Weisberger

This case is before me based on a Complaint filed by the Secretary of Labor on behalf of Paul Middleton alleging that J & C Mining discriminated against him in violation of section 105 of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. The Secretary seeks personal relief on behalf of Middleton, and a civil penalty. The matter was scheduled for hearing, and was partially heard on January 19, 20, and 21, 1999.

On January 21, 1999, during a recess, the parties advised that they had reached a settlement of this matter, and J & C Mining made a motion to approve the settlement and dismiss the case. The parties presented the terms of the settlement on the record. After due consideration, the motion was granted as follows, with the exception of minor changes not of a substantive nature.

The motion is granted. I have considered carefully the terms of the motion. I find that the settlement agreement entered into the record to be a very fair and just disposition of the issues. This conclusion is based upon my review of the terms of the settlement, along with a consideration of the entire record that has been presented .

217

ORDER

The terms of the settlement are approved, and it is ORDERED that (1) the record in this case be sealed; (2) Respondent pay a civil penalty of $1,000 within 30 days of this decision; (3) the parties shall abide by all of the terms of the settlement agreement; and (4) that this case be DISMISSED with prejudice.

Avram Weisberger
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Brian W. Dougherty, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, 2002 Richard Jones Road, Suite B-201, Nashville, TN 37215-2862 (Certified Mail)

Susan C. Lawson, Lawson & Lawson, Wheeler Building, Suite 301, 103 North First Street, P. O. Box 837, Harlan, KY 40831 (Certified Mail)

dcp

218

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace