J & C Mining, L.L.C. (ALJ decision, February 22, 1999)
Secretary of Labor v. J & C Mining, L.L.C. (FMSHRC KENT 99-61-D): Discrimination case settled for $1,000
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1999 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary of Labor brought a discrimination case on behalf of Paul Middleton against J & C Mining under section 105(c) of the Mine Act. The parties reached a settlement after the hearing had begun and presented its terms on the record. Judge Avram Weisberger approved the settlement, ordered J & C Mining to pay a $1,000 civil penalty, and required the parties to follow all settlement terms. The case was sealed and dismissed with prejudice.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, J & C Mining was ordered to pay $1,000, and the case was dismissed with prejudice.
- Key point: The judge found the settlement fair and just and made its terms enforceable through the dismissal order.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF A D M INISTRA TIV E LA W JUDGES 2 SK YLINE, 10 th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIK E
FA LLS CHURCH, V IRGINIA 22041
February 22, 1999
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. KENT 99-61-D
on behalf of PAUL MIDDLETON,
:
Complainant : BARB CD 98-19
v. :
: Mine No. 1
J & C MINING, L.L.C., : Mine ID 15-17707
Respondent
:
DECISION
Appearances: Brian W. Dougherty, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, Nashville, Tennessee, for the Secretary;
Susan C. Lawson, Esq., Lawson & Lawson, Harlan, Kentucky, for the Respondent.
Before: Judge Weisberger
This case is before me based on a Complaint filed by the Secretary of Labor on behalf of Paul Middleton alleging that J & C Mining discriminated against him in violation of section 105 of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. The Secretary seeks personal relief on behalf of Middleton, and a civil penalty. The matter was scheduled for hearing, and was partially heard on January 19, 20, and 21, 1999.
On January 21, 1999, during a recess, the parties advised that they had reached a settlement of this matter, and J & C Mining made a motion to approve the settlement and dismiss the case. The parties presented the terms of the settlement on the record. After due consideration, the motion was granted as follows, with the exception of minor changes not of a substantive nature.
The motion is granted. I have considered carefully the terms of the motion. I find that the settlement agreement entered into the record to be a very fair and just disposition of the issues. This conclusion is based upon my review of the terms of the settlement, along with a consideration of the entire record that has been presented .
217
ORDER
The terms of the settlement are approved, and it is ORDERED that (1) the record in this case be sealed; (2) Respondent pay a civil penalty of $1,000 within 30 days of this decision; (3) the parties shall abide by all of the terms of the settlement agreement; and (4) that this case be DISMISSED with prejudice.
Avram Weisberger
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Brian W. Dougherty, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, 2002 Richard Jones Road, Suite B-201, Nashville, TN 37215-2862 (Certified Mail)
Susan C. Lawson, Lawson & Lawson, Wheeler Building, Suite 301, 103 North First Street, P. O. Box 837, Harlan, KY 40831 (Certified Mail)
dcp
218
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace