J & C Mining, L.L.C., and Manalapan Mining Company, Inc. (Commission decision, June 27, 2000)

J & C Mining, L.L.C., and Manalapan Mining Company, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 99-248-D): Temporary reinstatement relief denied during expedited review

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
KENT 99-248-D
Decided
June 27, 2000
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-11

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2000, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2000
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This interlocutory order denied relief from temporary economic reinstatement and addressed briefing while the Commission review continued. It did not resolve the merits or finally dispose of the proceeding under 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The operators sought expedited Commission review after an ALJ dismissed the Secretary's discrimination complaint on behalf of Grant Noe, Jr. They also asked to stop paying the temporary economic reinstatement required by an earlier settlement order and to shorten the Secretary's time to file a reply brief. The Commission denied relief from the temporary reinstatement order, explaining that temporary reinstatement remains in effect while the Commission reviews the judge's decision. It also denied the request to shorten the briefing period, while confirming that the proceedings would be expedited as required by the Mine Act.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(1) and § 815(c)(3)
  • Outcome: Relief from the temporary economic reinstatement order and the request to shorten briefing time were denied.
  • Key point: Temporary reinstatement remains in effect during Commission review of the related discrimination decision.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1730 K STREET NW, 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006

June 27, 2000

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
:
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
:
on behalf of GRANT NOE, JR.
:
:
v. : Docket No. KENT 99-248-D
:
J & C MINING, L.L.C., and
:
MANALAPAN MINING COMPANY, INC.
:

BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Marks, Riley, Verheggen, and Beatty, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

In this discrimination proceeding arising under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (1994) (“Mine Act” or “Act”), Administrative Law Judge Gary Melick issued a decision dismissing a complaint brought by the Secretary of Labor on behalf of Grant Noe, Jr., alleging discrimination in violation of section 105(c)(1) of the Act, 30 U.S.C.
§ 815(c)(1). 22 FMSHRC 404, 410-11 (Mar. 2000) (ALJ). In a related temporary reinstatement proceeding, Docket No. KENT 99-174-D, the judge had issued a decision approving a settlement agreement, providing for the temporary economic reinstatement of Noe by J & C Mining, LLC (“J&C”). Unpublished Order at 1-2 (May 17, 1999).

On June 20, 2000, the operators, J&C and Manalapan Mining Company, Inc. (“Manalapan”) filed a Motion to Expedite Review by Commission. In the motion, the operators state that, having prevailed before the judge, they “desire relief from the order requiring payment of temporary economic benefits” to Noe. Mot. at 1. In addition, they request that review before this Commission be expedited, and that the time for filing a reply brief by the Secretary be reduced from 20 days to 10 days. Mot. at 2.

Upon consideration of the motion, the operators’ request for relief from the May 17, 1999 order providing for the economic reinstatement of Noe is denied.1 See Secretary of Labor on behalf

1
We note that, on June 19, 2000, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky issued an order granting the Secretary’s motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order requiring J&C and Manalapan to reinstate Noe temporarily, pending

22 FMSHRC 705

of Bernardyn v. Reading Anthracite Co., 21 FMSHRC 947, 949 (Sept. 1999) (“the language of the Mine Act requires that a temporary reinstatement order remain in effect while the Commission review the judge’s decision”). Furthermore, the Commission will be expediting these proceedings as it is statutorily required to do. See 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3) (“Proceedings under this section shall be expedited by the Secretary and the Commission.”); see also Bernardyn, 21 FMSHRC at 950 (recognizing the appropriateness of expediting cases involving parallel temporary reinstatement proceedings). Nonetheless, the operator’s request to reduce the period for filing the Secretary’s reply brief is denied because such a reduction would not materially advance the Commission’s expedited consideration of the case.

Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman

Marc Lincoln Marks, Commissioner

James C. Riley, Commissioner

Theodore F. Verheggen, Commissioner

Robert H. Beatty, Jr., Commissioner

resolution of this discrimination proceeding. Secretary of Labor v. J & C Mining, L.L.C., No. 00-217 (E.D. Ky., June 19, 2000). In the order, the Court stated that after the issuance of Judge Melick’s March decision, the operators ceased economic reinstatement of Noe. Id. at 2.

22 FMSHRC 706

Distribution

Jack Powasnik, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
4015 Wilson Blvd., Suite 400
Arlington, VA 22203

Susan C. Lawson, Esq.
Lawson & Lawson, PSC
P.O. Box 837
Harlan, KY 40831

22 FMSHRC 707

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace