Lodestar Energy, Inc. (ALJ decision, February 26, 1999)

Lodestar Energy, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 99-119-D): Temporary reinstatement settlement approved

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
KENT 99-119-D
Decided
February 26, 1999
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-11
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1999 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1999
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

MSHA alleged that Lodestar Energy suspended and discharged Morris Thompson after he filed safety complaints. The parties settled the application for temporary reinstatement, with Lodestar agreeing to place Thompson in a bulldozer-operator position at the same pay while the underlying matter remained pending. Judge Jacqueline R. Bulluck found the settlement acceptable and in the public interest. Because Thompson had been temporarily reinstated, the application was dismissed.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(2)
  • Outcome: The temporary-reinstatement settlement was approved and the case was dismissed.
  • Key point: A settlement resolving an application for temporary reinstatement may be approved when the agreed placement and pay terms serve the Mine Act's purposes.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, Suite 1000
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041

February 26, 1999

SECRETARY OF LABOR, : TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH : PROCEEDING
ADMINISTRATION, (MSHA),
:
on behalf of MORRIS THOMPSON : Docket No. KENT 99-119-D
Complainant
:
v. : PIKE CD 98-13
:
LODESTAR ENERGY, INC., : Shop Branch No. 2
Respondent : Mine ID 15-17939

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
OF APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT

Before: Judge Bulluck

On February 1, 1999, the Secretary of Labor filed an application for an order requiring Lodestar Energy, Inc., (ALodestar@) to reinstate temporarily Morris Thompson to his former position as a bulldozer operator at the Shop Branch No. 2 surface mine, or to a similar position at the same rate of pay, pending a hearing and final disposition of the case.

The application was supported by the declaration of Michael Belcher, Special Investigator for the Secretary's Mine Safety and Health Administration (AMSHA@), and a copy of Thompson's Discrimination Complaint filed with MSHA. In the application, the Secretary alleged that Lodestar suspended Thompson on July 31, 1998, then discharged him on August 3, 1998, because Thompson had filed safety complaints with MSHA.

The parties have filed a joint motion to approve settlement of the application for temporary reinstatement and to dismiss the case. Lodestar has agreed to withdraw its objection to the application for temporary reinstatement, and to temporarily reinstate Thompson to the position of first shift bulldozer operator at the Spradlin Branch surface mine, at the same rate of pay that he formerly received, pending final disposition of the case.

I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is acceptable.

WHEREFORE, the settlement agreement is in the public interest and will further the intent and purpose of the Act, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and the complainant, Morris Thompson, having been temporarily reinstated on February 22, 1999, by Lodestar, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED.

Jacqueline R. Bulluck
Administrative Law Judge

229


Page 2

Distribution:

Brian Dougherty, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 2002 Richard Jones Road, Suite B-201, Nashville, TN 37215 (Certified Maill)

Stanley S. Dawson, Esq., Lodestar Energy, Inc., 333 West Vine Street, Suite 1700, Lexington, KY 40507-1628 (Certified mail)

/nt

230

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace