The Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Company (ALJ decision, March 5, 1996)
The Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Company (FMSHRC KENT 96-38, KENT 95-785): Settlement approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1996 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The parties asked Judge Gary Melick to approve a settlement in two civil-penalty proceedings. The settlement removed the Significant and Substantial designation from Citation No. 4061992 and reduced a proposed penalty from $228 to $51. The judge found the settlement acceptable under the Mine Act's penalty criteria and ordered payment of $51 within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(d); 30 U.S.C. § 820(i)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, the S&S finding was deleted from Citation No. 4061992, and the penalty was reduced to $51.
- Key point: The judge approved the negotiated disposition after considering the parties' representations, supporting documents, and the statutory penalty criteria.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, SUITE 1000
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
March 5, 1996
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. KENT 96-38 Petitioner : A.C. No. 15-17044-03573
v. :
: Docket No. KENT 95-785
THE PITTSBURG & MIDWAY COAL : A.C. No. 15-17044-03570
MINING COMPANY,
:
Respondent :
: Sebree #1 Mine
DECISION
Appearances: Arthur J. Parks, Conference & Litigation Representative, U.S. Department of Labor, Madisonville, Kentucky, for Petitioner;
John H. Miller, Esq., The Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Company, Englewood, Colorado, for Respondent.
Before: Judge Melick
These cases are before me upon petitions for assessment of civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). During hearings the parties moved to approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss the cases. Deletion of the “Significant and Substantial” findings from Citation No. 4061992 and a reduction in penalty from $228 to $51 were proposed. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted, including testimonial and documentary evidence received at hearing, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is acceptable under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $51 within 30 days of this order.
Page 2
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Arthur J. Parks, Conference & Litigation Representative, U.S. Dept. of Labor, MSHA, 100 YMCA Drive, Madisonville, KY 42431
John H. Miller, Esq., The Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Company, P.O. Box 6518, Englewood, CO 80155-6518
/jf
2
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace