Rawl Sales and Processing Co. (ALJ decision, September 7, 1995)

Rawl Sales and Processing Co. (FMSHRC KENT 95-515-D and KENT 95-516-D): Discrimination settlements approved after reinstatement

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
KENT 95-515-D, KENT 95-516-D
Decided
September 7, 1995
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-13

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1995 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1995
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The ALJ approved the settlement, ordered payment of the reduced penalties, and dismissed the cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Robert Robinette and Dana Hager were reinstated with full backpay and benefits in discrimination proceedings involving Rawl Sales and Processing Co. The parties asked the Judge to approve a settlement that reduced the total proposed civil penalties from $18,000 to $10,000. Judge Arthur J. Amchan found that the settlement was consistent with the purposes of the Mine Act. He approved the settlement, ordered payment of the $10,000 total within 30 days, and dismissed both cases.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, total civil penalties were reduced to $10,000, and both discrimination cases were dismissed after reinstatement with full backpay and benefits.
  • Key point: The Judge approved the agreed resolution after the complainants had been reinstated with full backpay and benefits.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF A D M INISTRA TIV E LA W JUDGES 2 SK YLINE, 10 th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIK E
FA LLS CHURCH, V IRGINIA 22041

September 7, 1995

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
: Docket No. KENT 95-515-D
on behalf of
: MSHA Case No. PIKE CD 95-03
ROBERT ROBINETTE,
:
Complainant
: Tall Timber Mine
v. : I.D. No. 15-13720
:
RAWL SALES AND PROCESSING CO., :
Respondent
:
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
: Docket No. KENT 95-516-D
on behalf of DANA HAGER,
: MSHA Case No. PIKE CD 95-04
Complainant
:
v. : Tall Timber Mine
: I.D. No. 15-13720
RAWL SALES AND PROCESSING CO., :
Respondent
:

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Before: Judge Amchan

These cases are before me pursuant to section 105 of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act. As the Complainants have already been reinstated with full backpay and benefits, the parties have filed a motion to approve settlement and to dismiss the cases based on a reduction in the proposed civil penalties for the alleged discriminatory conduct. The terms of the settlement are that the total penalties for these matters have been reduced from $18,000 to $10,000. I have reviewed the settlement and conclude that it is consistent with the purposes of the Act.

ORDER

The parties' motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED.
Respondent shall pay the $10,000 in civil penalties within


Page 2

30 days of this order. Thereupon, these cases are dismissed.

Arthur J. Amchan
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Susan E. Foster, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 2002 Richard Jones Road, Suite B-201, Nashville, TN 37215-2862

Mark A. Toor, Esq., for Rawl Sales & Processing Co., A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc., P.O. Box 26765, Richmond, VA 23261

Tony Oppegard, Esq., Mine Safety Project of the Appalachian Research & Defense Fund of Kentucky, 630 Maxwelton Court, Lexington, KY 40508

/lh

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace