R B Coal Company (ALJ decision, April 6, 1995)

R B Coal Company (FMSHRC KENT 94-908): Settlement approved and penalties reduced to $5,690

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
KENT 94-908, KENT 94-942
Decided
April 6, 1995
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-13

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1995 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1995
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

R B Coal Company faced civil penalty proceedings involving KENT 94-908 and KENT 94-942. The proposed penalties totaled $42,320. The parties reached a settlement that reduced the total to $5,690, vacated an imminent-danger order in another related docket, changed several section 104(d)(1) matters to section 104(a) citations, and reduced the negligence findings from high to moderate. The settlement also removed the significant and substantial designation from two citations. Judge Jerold Feldman approved the agreement and ordered payment within 30 days, after which the cases would be dismissed.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 820(a) and 820(i)
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, the total proposed penalty was reduced from $42,320 to $5,690, and the cases were ordered dismissed after timely payment.
  • Key point: The approved settlement reduced negligence and citation classifications and removed the significant and substantial designation from two citations.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)


[DOCID: f:kt94908.wais]

R B COAL COMPANY
April 6, 1995
KENT 94-908

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041

April 6, 1995

SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS MINE AND SAFETY AND HEALTH : ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. KENT 94-908
Petitioner : A.C. No. 15-08293-03578 :
v. : Docket No. KENT 94-942
: A.C. No. 15-08293-03580
R B COAL COMPANY,
:
Respondent : R B No. 4 Mine

DECISION

Appearances: Donna E. Sonner, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor,
Nashville, Tennessee, for the Petitioner;
Susan C. Lawson, Esq., Harlan, Kentucky, for the Respondent.

Before: Judge Feldman

These proceedings concern petitions for assessment of civil penalties filed by the Secretary of Labor against the respondent pursuant to section 110(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act), 30 U.S.C. § 820(a). The petitions in these cases sought to impose a total civil penalty of $42,320 for the alleged violations of the cited mandatory safety standards.

These matters were called for hearing on March 14, 1995, in Pineville, Kentucky. At the commencement of the hearing, the parties informed me they had reached a settlement. Consequently, the parties moved for my approval of their agreement that results in a significant reduction in total civil penalties from $42,320 to $5,690. The settlement terms include vacating Imminent Danger Order No. 4235989 in Docket No. KENT 94-980. The parties' agreement with respect to Docket No. KENT 94-942 includes modification of 104(d)(1) Citation No. 4239646 to a 104(a) citation as well as modification of 104(d)(1) Order Nos. 4239645, 4239654, 4239655 and 4239657 to 104(a) citations. These modifications lower the degree of negligence attributable to the respondent for the cited violations from high to moderate. Finally, the agreement contemplates the removal of the significant and substantial designation from modified 104(a) Citation No. 4239645 and Citation No. 4240176 in Docket No. KENT 94-942.

Order

I have considered the representations of counsel presented at the hearing in support of the proposed agreement and I conclude that the settlement terms are appropriate under the criteria set forth in section 110(i) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. § 820(i). Accordingly, the parties' joint motion for the approval of settlement IS GRANTED and IT IS ORDERED that the respondent pay a penalty of $5,690 within 30 days of the date of this order. Upon timely receipt of payment, these cases ARE DISMISSED.

Jerold Feldman
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Donna E. Sonner, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 2002 Richard Jones Road, Suite B-201, Nashville, TN 37215 (Certified Mail)

Susan C. Lawson, Esq., Wheeler Building, Suite 301, 103 North First Street, P.O. Box 837, Harlan, KY 40831 (Certified Mail)

/rb

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace