Peabody Coal Company (ALJ decision, March 6, 1995)
Peabody Coal Company (FMSHRC KENT 94-815): $302 settlement approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1995 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Peabody Coal Company was the respondent in a civil penalty proceeding involving the Martwick Underground Mine. The Secretary proposed a settlement reducing the penalty from $378 to $302. Judge Gary Melick found the settlement acceptable under the Mine Act criteria and approved it. The $302 penalty was payable within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(d); 30 U.S.C. § 820(a)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, reducing the penalty to $302 payable within 30 days.
- Key point: The ALJ approved the negotiated penalty after finding the settlement acceptable under the Mine Act's statutory criteria.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
[DOCID: f:k94-815.wais]
PEABODY COAL COMPANY
March 6, 1995
KENT 94-815
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
March 6, 1995
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH : ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. KENT 94-815 Petitioner : A.C. No. 15-14074-03658
v. :
: Martwick Underground Mine
PEABODY COAL COMPANY, :
Respondent :
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Appearances: Donna E. Sonner, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor,
Nashville, Tennessee, for Petitioner;
Carl B. Boyd, Jr., Esq., Meyer, Hutchinson, Haynes and Boyd, Henderson, Kentucky, for Respondent.
Before: Judge Melick
This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). At hearing, Petitioner filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss the case. A reduction in penalty from $378 to $302 was proposed. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is acceptable under the criteria set forth in Section 110(a) of the Act.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $302 within 30 days of this order.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Donna E. Sonner, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 2002 Richard Jones Road, Suite B-201, Nashville, TN 37215-2862
Carl B. Boyd, Jr., Meyer, Hutchinson, Haynes & Boyd, 120 North Ingram Street, Suite A, Henderson, KY 42420
/jf
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace