Meshach Coal Company, Inc. (Commission decision, December 5, 1994)

Meshach Coal Company, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 94-436): Default order vacated and remanded

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
KENT 94-436
Decided
December 5, 1994
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-13

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1994, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1994
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission vacating a default order
The Commission vacated the Judge's default order and remanded so the Judge could evaluate Meshach's claimed settlement and decide whether default was warranted. This order did not decide that question or the proposed penalty; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Meshach Coal failed to answer the Secretary's proposed penalty assessment and an order to show cause, so the ALJ entered a default order assessing a $2,000 penalty. Meshach's president later told the Commission that he had settled the case for $500 and had already paid that amount. The Commission treated the letter as a timely petition for discretionary review, granted review, and remanded the matter because the record did not show whether default was warranted. The Commission vacated the default order and left the ALJ to decide the case on remand.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.69(b) and 2700.70(a)
  • Outcome: The default order was vacated and the case was remanded for a determination whether default was warranted.
  • Key point: When a party's timely request for review presents an unresolved factual record, the Commission may vacate a default order and return the matter to the ALJ.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. MESHACH COAL
DDATE:
19941205
TTEXT:


Page 2

~2378
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1730 K STREET NW, 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
:
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) :
:
v. : Docket No. KENT 94-436
:
MESHACH COAL COMPANY, INC. :
:

BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Doyle, Holen and Marks, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This civil penalty proceeding arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801 et seq. (1988) ("Mine Act"). On October 27, 1994, Chief Administrative Law Judge Paul Merlin issued an Order of Default to Meshach Coal Company, Inc. ("Meshach") for failing to answer the proposal for assessment of penalty filed by the Secretary of Labor on March 22, 1994, or the judge's June 30, 1994, Order to Show Cause. The judge assessed the civil penalty of $2,000 proposed by the Secretary.

On November 7, 1994, the Commission received a letter dated October 29, 1994, from Vernon Morris, president of Meshach. Morris states that he settled this case for $500 with Jason Huff, an attorney in the office of Department of Labor's Regional Solicitor in Barbourville, Kentucky. Morris states that he has paid that amount in full and he has attached to his letter a copy of the settlement agreement and his correspondence with Mr. Huff. FOOTNOTE 1

The judge's jurisdiction in this matter terminated when his decision was issued on October 27, 1994. 29 C.F.R. 2700.69(b) (1993). Under the Mine Act and the Commission's procedural rules, relief from a judge's decision may be sought by filing a petition for

ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 1/ Morris also attached a copy of a default order entered against Meshach by Judge Merlin on October 27, 1994, in a separate case, Docket No. KENT 94-337.


Page 3

~2379
discretionary review within 30 days of its issuance. 30 U.S.C. 823(d)(2); 29 C.F.R. 2700.70(a). We deem Meshach's motion to be a timely filed petition for discretionary review, which we grant. See, e.g., Middle States Resources, Inc., 10 FMSHRC 1130 (September 1988).

On the basis of the present record, we are unable to evaluate the merits of Meshach's position. In the interest of justice, we remand this matter to the judge, who shall determine whether default is warranted. See Hickory Coal Co., 12 FMSHRC 1201, 1202 (June 1990).

For the reasons set forth above, we vacate the judge's default order and remand this matter for further proceedings.

Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman

Joyce A. Doyle, Commissioner

Arlene Holen, Commissioner

Marc Lincoln Marks, Commissioner

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace