KYN Coal Company Incorporated, et al. (ALJ decision, October 4, 1994)

KYN Coal Company Incorporated, et al. (FMSHRC KENT 94-294, KENT 94-324, VA 94-32, VA 94-33, VA 94-34, VA 94-37, VA 94-38, VA 94-27, VA 94-28, VA 94-29, VA 94-30, VA 94-36): Operators ordered to address stays

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
KENT 94-294, KENT 94-324, VA 94-32, VA 94-33, VA 94-34, VA 94-37, VA 94-38, VA 94-27, VA 94-28, VA 94-29, VA 94-30, VA 94-36
Decided
October 4, 1994
Presiding judge
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Interlocutory order, not final
Checked against source
2026-08-13

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1994 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1994
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Interlocutory ALJ order, not Commission precedent
The judge requested the operators' views on possible stays and left the penalty proceedings pending. This order did not become a final disposition under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The ALJ considered a group of respirable-dust citation proceedings involving several coal operators. Some cases had been stayed pending related Commission proceedings concerning altered respirable-dust samples and expert testimony. The Secretary asked to lift some stays and leave other cases unstayed, but the operators had not yet been heard. The chief ALJ ordered the operators to submit their views on whether the cases should remain stayed within 30 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): None stated in this order.
  • Outcome: The operators were ordered to submit their views on whether the proceedings should be stayed.
  • Key point: The ALJ deferred a stay decision until the affected operators provided their positions.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. KYN COAL CO.
DDATE:
19941004
TTEXT:


Page 2

~2189
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. KENT 94-294 Petitioner : A. C. No. 15-17134-03514 :
v. : No. 4 Mine
KYN COAL COMPANY
:
INCORPORATED,
:
Respondent :
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. KENT 94-324 Petitioner : A. C. No. 15-17143-03501 KJS :
v. : No. 4 Mine
ENVIRONMENTAL MINE SERVICES, :
Respondent :
: Docket No. VA 94-32
: A. C. No. 44-06596-03501 KJS
:
: Docket No. VA 94-33
: A. C. No. 44-06395-03502 KJS
:
: No. 2 Mine
:
: Docket No. VA 94-34
: A. C. No. 44-06210-03501 KJS
:
: No. 9 Mine
:
: Docket No. VA 94-37
: A. C. No. 44-04703-03501 KJS
:
: No. 1 Mine
:
: Docket No. VA 94-38
: A. C. No. 44-03465-03501 KJS
:
: No. 3 Mine
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. VA 94-27 Petitioner : A. C. No. 44-03465-03534 :
v. : No. 3 Mine
C & S COAL COMPANY,
:
Respondent :


Page 3

~2190
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. VA 94-28 Petitioner : A. C. No. 44-06210-03527 :
: No. 9 Mine
v. :
EASTERN COAL COMPANY, :
Respondent :
:
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. VA 94-29 Petitioner : A. C. No. 44-06395-03569 :
: No. 2 Mine
v. :
BRENT COAL CORPORATION, :
Respondent :
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. VA 94-30 Petitioner : A. C. No. 44-06596-03579 :
v. : No. 2 Mine
BLANKENSHIP AND RIFE :
INCORPORATED,
:
Respondent :
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. VA 94-36 Petitioner : A. C. No. 44-04703-03578 :
: No. 1 Mine
v. :
HIGHLANDER COAL CORPORATION, :
Respondent :

ORDER TO SUBMIT INFORMATION

On August 18, 1994, the Solicitor filed a letter requesting that the stays in Kyn Coal Company, Docket No. Kent 94-294 and Environmental Mine Services, Docket Nos. KENT 94-324, VA 94-32, VA 94-33, VA 94-34, VA 94-37, and VA 94-38 be lifted, and that the remaining dockets, C & S Coal Company, Docket No. VA 94-27; Eastern Coal Company, Docket No. VA 94-28; Brent Coal Company, Docket No. VA 94-29; Blankenship & Rife Inc., Docket No. VA 94- 30; and Highlander Coal Corp., Docket No. VA 94-36, not be


Page 4

~2191
stayed. A copy of the letter was sent to counsels for the operators.

On April 13, 1994, I issued an order of stay in Kyn Coal Co,, pending a decision in the case specific trial in Keystone Coal Company, PENN 91-451-R et. al. A decision on the common issues had been previously rendered. 15 FMSHRC 1456 (July 1993). It appeared that the decision in Keystone Coal would be of some guidance in these matters. The cases involving Environmental Mine Services were stayed for the same reason. Thereafter, on April 20, 1994, a decision was issued in the case specific trial in Keystone Coal Company. 16 FMSHRC 857. And on May 27, 1994, the Commission granted review in IN RE: CONTESTS OF RESPIRABLE DUST SAMPLES ALTERATION CITATIONS, Master Docket No. 91-1 and Keystone Coal Mining Corporation, Docket Nos. PENN 91-451-R et al., involving both the common issues and mine-specific deci- sions. By order dated August 31, 1994, I granted the Secretary's motion to stay all cases in the master docket except for those on appeal to the Commission.

The Solicitor's letter in the instant cases states that the ultimate disposition in the cases now before the Commission will not affect the outcome of these cases because the respirable dust filters and the abnormal appearances are different than those in Keystone. I do not believe the specific outcome in these cases must depend upon the Commission's decision in Keystone in order for a stay to be appropriate. It is my belief that determina- tions by the Commission on matters such as burden of proof and expert testimony would be of assistance in these cases. However, the operators have not been heard from with respect to a stay.

In light of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that within 30 days the operators submit their views on whether or not these cases should be stayed.

Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge

Distribution: (Certified Mail)

Edward H. Fitch, Esq., Trial Attorney, Stephen D. Turow, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22203

Steven and Yvonne Rife, Environmental Mine Services, P. O. Box 567, Hurley, VA 24620

Robert J. Breimann, Esq., Street, Street, Street, Scott & Bowman, 339 West Main Street, P. O. Box 2100, Grundy, VA 24614

Thomas R. Scott, Jr., Esq., Terrence Shea Cook, Esq., Street, Street, Street, Scott & Bowman, 339 West Main Street, P. O. Box 2100, Grundy, VA 24614

Ronald L. King, Esq., Robertson, Cecil, King & Pruitt, 237 Main Street, Drawer 1560, Grundy, VA 24614


Page 5

Mr. Kermit Rife, President, Blankenship & Rife, Inc., Route 1, Box 497, Grundy, VA 24614

Billy R. Shelton, Esq., Baird, Baird, Baird & Jones, PSC, 415 Second Street, P. O. Box 351, Pikeville, KY 41502

Carl E. McAfee, Esq., McAfee, Bledsoe & Associates, PC., 1033 Virginia Avenue, P. O. Box 656, Norton, VA 24273-0656

/gl

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace