Manalapan Mining Company, Inc.
Manalapan Mining Company, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 93-666, KENT 93-670, KENT 93-671, KENT 93-705): Settlement approved for $12,100
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Manalapan Mining Company faced civil penalty proceedings across four dockets involving Mine Nos. 1, 6, and 7. Judge Roy J. Maurer approved a settlement that reduced the proposed penalties from $14,612 to $12,100. The company was ordered to pay the settlement amount within 30 days, and the cases were resolved through the approved agreement.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(d) and 30 U.S.C. § 820(i)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved and Manalapan Mining Company was ordered to pay $12,100.
- Key point: The judge accepted a multi-docket civil penalty settlement after considering the parties' submissions, record testimony, and statutory penalty criteria.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. KENT 93-666
Petitioner : A. C. No. 15-16318-03578
v. :
: Mine No. 6
MANALAPAN MINING COMPANY, :
INC., : Docket No. KENT 93-670
Respondent : A. C. No. 15-05423-03731
:
: Docket No. KENT 93-671
: A. C. No. 15-05423-03735
:
: Mine No. 1
:
: Docket No. KENT 93-705
: A. C. No. 15-16733-03543
:
: Mine No. 7
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Appearances: Joseph B. Luckett, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U. S. Department of Labor, Nashville, Tennessee,
for the Secretary;
Richard D. Cohelia, Safety Director, Manalapan,
Mining Company, Inc., Evarts, Kentucky, for
Respondent.
Before: Judge Maurer
These cases are before me upon a petition for assessment of
civil penalties under section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety
and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). An evidentiary hearing in
these matters was held on November 4, 1993, in London, Kentucky.
At the conclusion of that hearing, the parties filed a motion to
approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss these cases.
Page 3
~2500
The citations, initial assessments, and the proposed
settlement amounts are as follows:
CITATION/ PROPOSED PROPOSED
ORDER NO. ASSESSMENT SETTLEMENT
KENT 93-666
4239039 $ 793 $ 520
4239040 690 690
4239181 690 690
4239182 690 100
KENT 93-670
3000222 431 200
3000224 506 506
3164702 431 200
3146703 431 431
3164704 431 431
3164708 690 690
3164709 690 690
3164710 431 428
3164712 431 431
3164713 431 431
3164714 431 431
3164718 431 431
KENT 93-671
3164648 903 900
3164650 903 900
4239362 309 100
4239363 903 900
KENT 93-705
9885266 793 500
9885275 2173 1500
TOTAL $14,612 $12,100
I have considered the representations and documentation
submitted in these cases, as well as the testimony contained in
the record of proceedings and I conclude that the proffered
settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in
section 110(i) of the Act.
Page 4
~2501
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED,
and it is ORDERED that respondent pay a penalty of $12,100 within
30 days of this order.
Roy J. Maurer
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Joseph B. Luckett, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U. S. Department of Labor, 2002 Richard Jones Road, Suite B-201,
Nashville, TN 37215 (Certified Mail)
Richard D. Cohelia, Safety Director, Manalapan Mining Company,
Inc., Rt. 1, Box 374, Evarts, KY 40828 (Certified Mail)
dcp
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1993, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.