Toler Creek Energy, Inc. (ALJ decision, August 2, 1993)

Toler Creek Energy, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 93-650-D): Settlement approved and proceeding dismissed with prejudice

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
KENT 93-650-D
Decided
August 2, 1993
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-14

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1993
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary of Labor, on behalf of Brian K. Moore, brought a temporary reinstatement proceeding against Toler Creek Energy, Inc. The parties reached an amicable settlement and jointly moved to dismiss the proceeding with prejudice. Judge Roy J. Maurer approved the settlement, granted the motion, and dismissed the proceeding with prejudice. The order does not identify a mine-safety standard or a penalty amount.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: None identified in the release.
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, and the proceeding was dismissed with prejudice.
  • Key point: The ALJ approved the parties' settlement and ended the temporary reinstatement proceeding.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
BRIAN K. MOORE V. TOLER CREEK ENERGY
DDATE:
19930802
TTEXT:


Page 2

~1574

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH : PROCEEDING
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
:
ON BEHALF OF BRIAN MOORE, : Docket No. KENT 93-650-D Applicant :
and
: PIKE-CD 93-07
:
BRIAN K. MOORE,
: Mine No. 3
Intervenor :
v. :
:
TOLER CREEK ENERGY, INC., :
Respondent :

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before: Judge Maurer

All the parties to this proceeding have reached an amicable settlement and counsel have therefore jointly moved to dismiss this proceeding, with prejudice, on the basis of their settlement agreement.

Accordingly, and for good cause shown, the proposed settle- ment is approved, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the captioned proceeding is DISMISSED, with prejudice.

Roy J. Maurer
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Gretchen N. Lucken, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 400, Arlington, VA 22203 (Certified Mail)

Tony Oppegard, Esq., Mine Safety Project of the Appalachian Research & Defense Fund of Kentucky, Inc., 630 Maxwelton Court, Lexington, VA 40508 (Certified Mail)

Mark M. Lawson, Esq., White, Elliott & Bundy, P. O. Box 8400, Bristol, VA 24203-8400 (Certified Mail)

dcp

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace