Broken Hill Mining Company, Inc. (ALJ decision, March 17, 1994)
Broken Hill Mining Company, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 93-634 and consolidated dockets): Default decision entered with $1,829 penalty
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1994 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Broken Hill Mining Company faced four consolidated civil penalty proceedings involving Mine Nos. 3 and 1. After the judge ordered the company to contact the Secretary about settlement, comply with the prehearing order, or show cause for its failure, the company did not comply. Judge Avram Weisberger entered a default decision in favor of the Secretary and ordered Broken Hill to pay $1,829 within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: None stated in the decision
- Outcome: Default was entered in favor of the Secretary, and Broken Hill was ordered to pay a $1,829 civil penalty.
- Key point: Failure to comply with a show-cause order in a civil penalty proceeding can result in default and assessment of the full amount sought.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. BROKEN HILL MINING
DDATE:
19940317
TTEXT:
~565
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. KENT 93-410 Petitioner : A. C. No. 15-14959-03548
v. :
: Docket No. KENT 93-550
BROKEN HILL MINING COMPANY, INC., : A. C. No. 15-14959-03549 Respondent :
: Docket No. KENT 93-633
: A. C. No. 15-14959-03550
:
: Mine No. 3
:
: Docket No. KENT 93-634
: A. C. No. 15-15637-03547
:
: Mine No. 1
DEFAULT DECISION
Before: Judge Weisberger
On November 19, 1993, a Show Cause Order was issued which provided, inter alia as follows:
Therefore, it is ORDERED that by November 30, 1993, Respondent shall either contact Petitioner to discuss settlement and file a statement complying with the terms of the prehearing order, or show cause why it has not complied with the prehearing order. It is further ordered that if Respondent fails to comply with this order, a default decision will be entered ordering Respondent to pay the full assessed amounts in these cases.
To date Respondent has not complied with this order.
(Footnote 1)
___
1 On January 24, 1994, an Answers were received from Respondent, which had already been filed on July 28, 1993. These Answers do not comply with the show cause order.
~566
According, it is ordered that a default decision be entered in these cases in favor of the Secretary. It is further Ordered that Respondent pay a civil penalty of $1,829 within 30 days of this decision.
Avram Weisberger
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Mary Sue Taylor, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, 2002 Richard Jones Road, Suite B-201, Nashville, TN 37215 (Certified Mail)
Mr. Hobart Anderson, President, Broken Hill Mining Company, P.O. Box 989, Ashland, KY 41105 (Certified Mail)
/efw
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace