Sunny Ridge Mining Company, Inc. (ALJ decision, January 6, 1998)

Sunny Ridge Mining Company, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 93-63, KENT 93-259, KENT 93-863, KENT 94-453, KENT 94-454): Remand penalties and liability resolved

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
KENT 93-63, KENT 93-259, KENT 93-863, KENT 94-453, KENT 94-454
Decided
January 6, 1998
Presiding judge
Outcome
Mixed result
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-12

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1998 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1998
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision on remand, not Commission precedent
This January 1998 decision resolved the issues returned by the Commission in February 1997. No later Commission review appears in the official index, so it became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

These consolidated cases returned to the judge after a Commission remand. The parties agreed to modify the violation involving 30 C.F.R. § 77.405(b) from a section 104(d) citation with a $3,000 penalty to a section 104(a) significant-and-substantial citation with moderate negligence and a $431 penalty. The judge dismissed the section 110(c) claim against Tracy Damron concerning that citation, assessed Mitch Potter a $6,000 penalty, and assessed Damron $1,200 for three other orders. Sunny Ridge was ordered to pay $431.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 77.405(b)
  • Outcome: One violation was modified, one individual-liability claim was dismissed, and penalties of $431, $6,000, and $1,200 were ordered.
  • Key point: On remand, the judge resolved the remaining liability and penalty issues through the parties' agreement and the Mine Act penalty criteria.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)


[DOCID: f:k93-63.wais]

SUNNY RIDGE MINING COMPANY, INC.
January 6, 1998
KENT 93-63

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041

January 6, 1998

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. KENT 93-63 Petitioner : A. C. No. 15-17081-03507
v. :
: Docket No. KENT 93-259
SUNNY RIDGE MINING COMPANY, : A. C. No. 15-17081-03511
INC.,
:
Respondent : Docket No. KENT 93-863 : A. C. No. 15-17081-03513
:
: No. 9 Mine
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. KENT 94-453 Petitioner : A. C. No. 15-17081-03516 A
v. :
: No. 9 Mine
MITCH POTTER Employed by :
SUNNY RIDGE MINING COMPANY,:
INC.,
:
Respondent :
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. KENT 94-454 Petitioner : A. C. No. 15-17081-03517 A
v. :
: No. 9 Mine
TRACY DAMRON Employed by :
SUNNY RIDGE MINING COMPANY,:
INC.,
:
Respondent :

DECISION ON REMAND

Appearances: MaryBeth Bernui, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, Nashville, Tennessee, for Petitioner;
Reed D. Anderson, Esq., Harrison and Anderson, Pikeville, Kentucky, for Respondent.

Before: Judge Weisberger

These consolidated cases are before me based upon the Commission's decision in this matter, 19 FMSHRC 254 (1997), remanding the following issues:

1. the liability of Sunny Ridge Mining Company and Tracy Damron for violating 30 C.F.R § 77.405(b) as alleged in citation number 4020202;

2. the appropriate penalty to be assessed Tracy Damron concerning order numbers 4020210, 4020075, and 4020076; and

3. the appropriate penalty to be assessed against Mitch Potter concerning order number 4020076.[1] Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held on November 5, 1997, to resolve the issues raised by the Commission's remand. On December 15, 1997, Respondents' filed a brief, and on December 18, 1997, the Secretary filed a brief on remand.

I. The violation by Respondents of 30 C.F.R. § 77.405(b) as alleged in Citation No. 4020202.

The parties entered into an agreement, based on the evidence presented at the original hearing and the Commission's decision, 17 FMSHRC supra, to modify the original violation from a Section 104(d) citation assessed at $3,000 to a Citation 104(a) significant and substantial violation of moderate negligence with a penalty of $431. The parties also agreed to vacate the Section 110(c) violation against Damron. Considering the representations of the parties, the evidence presented at the initial hearing, and the Commission's decision, 17 FMSHRC supra, I conclude that the settlement is appropriate under the terms of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 ("the Act").

II. The penalty to be assessed against Mitch Potter concerning order number 2020076.

The parties stipulated that Potter has no previous or pending 110(c) violations, and that, in light of his income and family support obligations and the effects of the penalty, he has the ability to pay a penalty of $6,000. With regard to Potter's responsibilities and duties of the mine the record indicates that he was the president of the company, was present at the mine site on the date the order was issued, and was familiar with the conditions of the highwalls and the spoilbank at issue. Based on all these factors, and considering the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act, as interpreted by the Commission in its decision, 17 FMSHRC supra, I find that a penalty of $6,000 is appropriate.

III. The penalty to be assessed Tracy Damron concerning order numbers 4020210, 4020075, and 4020076.

Damron was in charge of making preshift inspections, was responsible for making sure equipment was repaired, and was responsible for scheduling and job assignments of employees. Both Damron and his wife testified regarding his income and family and support obligations. Taking into account his income, and family and support obligations as testified to at the hearing, and his not having had any history of previous or pending Section 110(c) violations, and considering the other factors set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act as established at the initial hearing, I find that the following penalties are appropriate for the violations established in the following orders: 4020210 - $300, 4020075 - $400 and 4020076-$500.

ORDER

It is ordered as follows:

1. The Section 110(c) Petition against Damron for a violation of Section 110(c) relating to citation number 4020202 shall be dismissed;

2. Respondent Sunny Ridge Mining shall pay a civil penalty of $431 within 30 days of this Decision;

3. Respondent Potter shall, within 30 day of this decision, pay a civil penalty of $6,000; and

4. Respondent Damron shall, within 90 days of this decision, pay a total civil penalty of $1,200.

Avram Weisberger
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

MaryBeth Bernui, Esq.,
Office of the
Solicitor, U. S.
Department of Labor,
2002 Richard Jones
Road, Suite B-201,
Nashville, TN 37215-
2862 (Certified Mail)

Reed D. Anderson, Esq.,
Harrison and Anderson,
P. O. Box 279,
Pikeville, KY 41502
(Certified Mail)

/lt

FOOTNOTES

[1]:These cases were initially remanded to Judge William Fauver who presided at the initial hearing and issued the initial decision, but were subsequently reassigned to the undersigned.

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace