Wilgar Land Company, Inc.
Wilgar Land Company, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 92-919): Settlement approved and penalty reduced
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary sought civil penalties against Wilgar Land Company in two proceedings involving its No. 3 Mine. The parties proposed a settlement that reduced the penalty from $2,755 to $1,000. Judge Gary Melick approved the settlement and ordered payment in equal monthly installments beginning September 1, 1993.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): None stated in the decision.
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, the penalty was reduced to $1,000, and the cases were ordered dismissed after payment.
- Key point: The judge found the proposed settlement consistent with the Mine Act penalty criteria.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. KENT 92-919
Petitioner : A.C. No. 15-10396-03557
v. :
: Docket No. KENT 92-920
WILGAR LAND COMPANY, INC., : A.C. No. 15-10396-03558
Respondent : No. 3 Mine
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Appearances: Mary Sue Taylor, Esquire, Office of the
Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor,
Nashville, Tennessee, for Petitioner;
Barry Johns, Wilgar Land Company, Inc.,
Robinson Creek, Kentucky, for Respondent
Before: Judge Melick
These cases are before me upon petitions for assessment
of civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). At hearings, the
parties filed a motion to approve settlement agreement and
to dismiss the cases. A reduction in penalty from $2,755
to $1,000 was proposed. I have considered the representations
and documentation submitted in these cases, and I conclude
that the proffered settlement is consistent with the criteria
in Section 110(i) of the Act.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is
GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of
$1,000 in equal monthly installments commencing on September 1,
1993, and continuing on the first day of each month thereafter
until fully paid.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Mary Sue Taylor, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, 2002 Richard Jones Road,
Suite B-201, Nashville, TN 37215 (Certified Mail)
Barry Johns, Wilgar Land Company, Inc., Box 266,
Robinson Creek, KY 41560 (Certified Mail)
Robert Newsome, Wilgar Land Company, Inc.,
P.O. Box 2200, Robinson Creek, KY 41560 (Certified Mail)
\lh
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1993, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.