Woodland Hills Mining Company and Broken Hill Mining Company
Woodland Hills Mining Company and Broken Hill Mining Company (FMSHRC KENT 92-712 and KENT 93-170): Settlement approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Woodland Hills Mining Company and Broken Hill Mining Company faced civil penalty proceedings under the Mine Act. At the hearing, the parties reported that they had reached settlement agreements and proposed reducing a $486 penalty to $200. Judge Avram Weisberger found the settlement appropriate under section 110(i) of the Act, granted the motion, and ordered the respondent to pay $486 within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: The order does not identify specific Mine Act standards.
- Outcome: The settlement motion was granted, and payment of $486 was ordered within 30 days.
- Key point: The ALJ approved the settlement after finding it met the Mine Act's section 110(i) criteria.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COWWrSSION
OFFICEOFADMINISTRATIVELAW JUDGES
• •
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PiKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
JUL 7 1993
SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. KENT 92-712
Petitioner A.C. No. 15-16801-03509
V. No. 1 Mine
WOODLAND HILLS MINING COMPANY,
Respondent
SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. KENT 93-170
Petitioner A.C. No. 15-15637-03541
Vl No. 1 Mine
BROKEN HILL MINING COMPANY,
Respondent
DECISION
Appearances: Mary Sue Taylor, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor,
Office of the Solicitor, Nashville, Tennessee,
for Petitioner;
Mr. Hobart W. Anderson, Broken Hill Mining
Company, and Woodland Hills Mining, Ashland,
Kentucky for Respondent.
Before: Judge Weisberger
These cases are before me upon petitions for assessment of
civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 (the Act). The cases were scheduled for
hearing on June 16, 1993, in Huntington, West Virginia. At the
hearing, the parties appeared and advised that they had reached a
settlement covering the matters at issue. Petitioner made a
motion to approve settlement agreements and to dismiss these
cases. A reduction in penalty from $486 to $200 is proposed. I
have considered the representations and documentation submitted
in this case, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is
appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section ll0(i) of the
Act.
1316
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED,
penalty of $486 within 30
and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay
days of this order.
Avram
• Weisberger
•//
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Mary Sue Taylor, Esq., office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department
of Labor, 2002 Richard Jones Road, Suite B-201, Nashville, TN
37215 (by Fascimile and Regular Mail)
Mr. Hobart W. Anderson, President, Broken Hill Mining Company,
P.O. Box 989, Ashland, KY
and Woodland Hills Mining Company Inc.,
41105 (by Fascimile and Regular Mail)
nb
1317
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1993, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.