Raven Mining Company (ALJ decision, January 27, 1993)
Raven Mining Company (FMSHRC KENT 92-434): Settlement approved at $500
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Raven Mining agreed to resolve a civil penalty proceeding after a hearing. The Secretary proposed reducing the penalty from $1,000 to $500. The Judge reviewed the parties' representations, supporting documents, and the trial proceedings, found the settlement appropriate under the Mine Act's penalty criteria, and ordered Raven Mining to pay $500 within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 815(d) and 820(i)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved and a $500 penalty was ordered.
- Key point: An ALJ may approve a negotiated penalty reduction after reviewing the settlement record and the statutory penalty criteria.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. KENT 92-434 Petitioner : A.C. No. 15-16743-03509
v. :
: No.3 Mine
RAVEN MINING COMPANY, :
Respondent :
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Appearances: Darren L. Courtney, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor,
Nashville, Tennessee, for the Petitioner;
Billy R. Shelton, Esq., Baird, Baird, Baird, and Jones, P.S.C., Pikeville, Kentucky, for the Respondent
Before: Judge Melick
This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). Following hearings on October 23, 1992, Petitioner filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss the case. A reduction in penalty from $1,000 to $500 was proposed. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case, as well as proceedings at trial, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $500 within 30 days of this order.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Darren L. Courtney, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 2002 Richard Jones Road, Suite B-201, Nashville, TN 37215 (Certified Mail)
Billy R. Shelton, Esq., Baird, Baird, Baird and Jones, P.S.C., 415 Second Street, P.O. Box 351, Pikeville, KY 41502 (Certified Mail)
/lh
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace