Harlan-KYVA Coal Inc. (ALJ decision, February 19, 1993)
Harlan-KYVA Coal Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 92-226, KENT 92-182, KENT 92-171, KENT 92-170, and KENT 92-169): Five penalty cases settled for $5,682
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Harlan-KYVA Coal faced five civil penalty proceedings with proposed penalties totaling $9,370. The parties proposed reducing the penalties to $5,682 based on the operator's financial condition. Judge Paul Merlin relied on accounting reports showing a deficit in stockholder equity and a net operating loss, and found the settlements appropriate under the penalty criteria, especially the operator's ability to continue in business. The operator was ordered to pay $5,682 within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): The decision does not identify a specific standard section.
- Outcome: Five penalty proceedings were settled for $5,682, reduced from $9,370.
- Key point: The operator's documented financial condition supported a reduced settlement under the ability-to-continue-in-business criterion.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. KENT 92-226 Petitioner : A. C. No. 15-11292-03582 : Mine No. 1
:
v. : Docket No. KENT 92-182
: A. C. No. 15-14235-03588
HARLAN-KYVA COAL INC.,
: Docket No. KENT 92-171
Respondent : A. C. No. 15-14235-03587 :
: Docket No. KENT 92-170
: A. C. No. 15-14235-03586
: Mine No. 2
:
: Docket No. KENT 92-169
: A. C. No. 15-10818-03531
: Mine No. 3
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Merlin
These cases are before me upon the petitions for assessment of the civil penalties under section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. The parties have filed a joint motion to approve settlements. A reduction in penalties from $9,370 to $5,682 is proposed. The reduction is based upon the operator's financial condition. Reports from the operator's accountants show a balance sheet with a net deficit in stockholder equity and a profit and loss sheet with a net operating loss. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in these cases, and I conclude that the proffered settlements are appropriate under the criteria set forth in section 110(i) of the Act, particularly the criterion of the operator's ability to continue in business.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlements is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that the operator PAY a penalty of $5,682 within 30 days of this order.
Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge
Distribution: (Certified Mail)
W. F. Taylor, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 2002 Richard Jones Rd., Suite B-201, Nashville, TN 37215
Mr. Carl E. McAfee, Esq., 1033 Virginia Ave., P.O. Box 656, Norton, Virginia 24273-0656
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace