FMSHRC ALJ decision Docket KENT 92-1013 Decided November 9, 1992 Settled Judge Avram Weisberger

Peabody Coal Company

Peabody Coal Company (FMSHRC KENT 92-1013): Settlement approved for $1,700

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1992 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1992
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Peabody Coal Company agreed to settle a civil penalty proceeding involving its Camp No. 1 Mine. Judge Avram Weisberger approved the settlement under the Mine Act's penalty criteria. Peabody agreed to pay the proposed $1,700 penalty in full, and the case was dismissed after payment.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standards: None stated in the settlement order.
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, and Peabody was ordered to pay $1,700.
  • Key point: The judge approved the proposed settlement after reviewing the parties' representations and supporting documentation under the Mine Act's penalty criteria.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
MSHA V. PEABODY COAL
DDATE:
19921109
TTEXT:


Page 2

~1824

      FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

             OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
                    2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
                     5203 LEESBURG PIKE
                FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041

SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. KENT 92-1013
Petitioner : A. C. No. 15-02709-03766
v. :
: Camp No. 1 Mine
PEABODY COAL COMPANY, :
Respondent :

                          DECISION

Appearances: W. F. Taylor, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor,
Office of the Solicitor, Nashville, Tennessee,
for Petitioner;
David R. Joest, Esq., Peabody Coal Company,
Henderson, Kentucky, for Respondent.

Before: Judge Weisberger

 This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of

civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 (the Act). Pursuant to notice, the case was
scheduled for hearing on September 2, 1992. On that date, prior
to going on the record, counsel indicated that they had just
settled this matter. On October 9, 1992, Petitioner filed a
motion to approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss this
case. Respondent has agreed to pay the proposed penalty of
$1,700 in full. I have considered the representations and
documentation submitted in this case, and I conclude that the
proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth
in Section 110(i) of the Act.

 WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED,

and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $1,700 within
30 days of this order.
Avram Weisberger
Administrative Law Judge


Page 3

~1825

Distribution:

W. F. Taylor, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of
Labor, 2002 Richard Jones Road, Suite B-201, Nashville, TN 37215
(Certified Mail)

David R. Joest, Esq., Midwest Division Counsel, Peabody Coal
Company, 1951 Barrett Court, P.O. Box 1990, Henderson, KY 42420-
1990 (Certified Mail)

nb

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1992, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.