FMSHRC ALJ decision Docket KENT 91-193 Decided August 27, 1991 Settled Judge Gary Melick

R B Coal Company, Incorporated

R B Coal Company, Incorporated (FMSHRC KENT 91-193): Settlement approved and penalty reduced

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1991 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1991
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became the final decision of the Commission 40 days after issuance because the Commission did not direct review (30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1)). It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

R B Coal Company faced a civil penalty proceeding concerning Mine No. 3. The Secretary proposed reducing the penalty from $300 to $100 as part of a settlement, and the company agreed to send future dust samples by certified mail. Judge Gary Melick approved the settlement and ordered payment of the $100 penalty within 30 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(d); 30 U.S.C. § 820(i)
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved and the penalty was reduced to $100.
  • Key point: The ALJ approved a reduced penalty after the operator agreed to use certified mail for future dust samples.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Office of Administrative Law Judges
2 Skyline, 10th Floor
5203 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, Virginia 22041

SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. KENT 91-193
PETITIONER A.C. No. 15-13362-03582
v.
Mine No. 3
R B COAL COMPANY, INCORPORATED,
RESPONDENT

                     DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Appearances: Mary Sue Taylor, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, Nashville, Tennessee,
for the Petitioner;
Susan C. Lawson, Esq., Forester, Buttermore,
Turner & Lawson, P.S.C., Harlan, Kentucky, for the
Respondent.

Before: Judge Melick

 This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of

civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 (the Act). At hearings, Petitioner filed a
motion to approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss the case.
A reduction in penalty from $300 to $100 was proposed and
Respondent noted that he would in the future send all of his dust
samples by certified mail. I have considered the representations
and documentation submitted in this case, and I conclude that the
proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth
in Section 110(i) of the Act.

 WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED,

and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $100 within 30
days of this order.

                                  Gary Melick
                                  Administrative Law Judge

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1991, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.