Kem Coal Company (ALJ decision, May 28, 1992)

Kem Coal Company (FMSHRC KENT 90-30-D): Damages ordered after discriminatory-discharge finding

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
KENT 90-30-D
Decided
May 28, 1992
Presiding judge
Outcome
Other
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-15
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1992 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1992
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: FMSHRC released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

An earlier decision found Kem Coal Company liable for discriminating against Charles T. Smith in violation of section 105(c) of the Mine Act. The parties stipulated that back pay and interest through April 30, 1992, totaled $46,157.12, and that attorney fees and costs totaled $6,247.50. Judge William Fauver ordered Kem Coal to pay those amounts within 10 days, with additional amounts accruing until payment, and directed the parties to resolve any medical-expense damages under their stipulation. The decision, together with the prior remand decision, was the judge's final disposition of the proceeding.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)
  • Outcome: Kem Coal was ordered to pay $46,157.12 in back pay and interest plus $6,247.50 in attorney fees and costs, with further amounts as specified in the order.
  • Key point: After liability for discriminatory discharge was established, the judge entered the stipulated monetary relief and procedures for any medical-expense damages.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041

MAY 28 1992

CHARLES T. SMITH, .. DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
Complainant
..
.. Docket No. KENT 90-30-D
V. .. BARB CD 89-27
..
KEM COAL COMPANY,

Respondent
..

DECISION ON DAMAGES
Before: Judge Fauver
The Decision on Remand, April 28, 1992, found Respondent liable for a discriminatory discharge of Complainant in violation of § 105(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.
The parties have stipulated that Complainant's back pay and interest through April 30, 1992, are $46,157.12 and a reasonable attorney fee and costs are $6,247.50 through April 30, 1992. In addition, the parties have stipulated a method of determining any damages for medical expenses due Complainant.
ORDER
WHEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Respondent shall, within 10 days of the date of this Decision, pay Complainant $46,157.12 in back pay and interest through April 30, 1992, plus additional back pay and interest accruing from April 30, 1992, until the date of payment.
2. Respondent shall, within 10 days of the date of this Decision, pay to counsel for Complainant $6,247.50 representing a reasonable attorney fee and costs through April 30, 1992, plus any additional reasonable attorney fee and costs accruing from April 30, 1992, until the date of payment. Upon such payment, Counsel for Complainant shall promptly reimburse Complainant for any prior payments made by Complainant toward an attorney fee or litigation costs in this matter.
3. Within 10 days of this Decision, or a later date if stipulated by the parties, the parties shall fully comply with Paragraph 5 of their Stipulation of Monetary Award Update, and if they agree upon damages for medical expenses such amount shall be

907


Page 2

r- ___ , ~ ..^.. ,.l...... ..” . I .^ _ . . .._.I. -. ” .

promptly paid to Complainant. If they fail to agree on medical damages and Complainant contends such are due, Complainant may file a claim for such damages in a supplemental proceeding before the Commission within 30 days after such disagreement is communicated by Respondent to Complainant.

4. This Decision on Damages together with the prior Decision on Remand constitutes the judge's final disposition of this proceeding.

Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Michael S. Endicott, Esq., L.E., @'Ed" Spencer and Associates, 83 Main Street, P.O. Box 1176, Paintsville, KY 42140 (Certified Mail)

Timothy Joe Walker, Esq., Reece, Lang & Breeding, P.S.C., London Bank & Trust Building, 400 South Main Street, P. 0. Drawer 5087, London, KY 40745-5087 (Certified Mail)

/fas

908

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace