Big Elk Creek Coal Company, Inc.
Big Elk Creek Coal Company, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 89-45-D): Discrimination case dismissed after withdrawal
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1989 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Arnold Sharp asked to withdraw his discrimination complaint against Big Elk Creek Coal Company. Judge George A. Koutras granted the request and dismissed the case. The order contains no ruling on the underlying discrimination allegations.
Decision snapshot
- Cited provision: None stated in the decision.
- Outcome: The complaint was withdrawn and the discrimination proceeding was dismissed.
- Key point: The ALJ ended the proceeding after the complainant requested withdrawal.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
ARNOLD SHARP V. BIG ELK CREEK COAL
DDATE:
19890330
TTEXT:
Page 2
~446
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.)
Office of Administrative Law Judges
ARNOLD SHARP, DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
COMPLAINANT
Docket No. KENT 89-45-D
v. MSHA Case No. PIKE CD 88-18
BIG ELK CREEK COAL COMPANY,
INC.,
RESPONDENT
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Before: Judge Koutras
Mr. Sharp's request of March 27, 1989, to withdraw his
complaint in this matter IS GRANTED, and this case IS DISMISSED.
George A. Koutras
Administrative Law Judge
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1989, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.