Ampak Mining, Inc. (ALJ decision, March 9, 1990)
Ampak Mining, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 89-13-D and KENT 89-14-D): Damages and attorney fees awarded
What's the rule today?
This ALJ decision was superseded by the Commission's decision in the same case. Ezel starts from the controlling decision and answers your situation under current law, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The judge had previously found that Ampak Mining discriminated against David Thomas and George Issacs in violation of section 105(c)(1) of the Mine Act. The parties stipulated that Thomas was owed $6,250 in backpay and Issacs was owed $6,080, plus interest calculated under the Commission's formula. The judge also awarded $43,806.80 in attorney's fees and litigation expenses because the request was not challenged. A motion to enforce the judgment against Ampak's owners individually was denied because enforcement efforts had to be directed to the Secretary of Labor. Ampak was ordered to pay the backpay, interest, fees, and expenses within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(1); 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3)
- Outcome: Backpay, interest, attorney's fees, and litigation expenses were awarded, and the motion to proceed against the owners individually was denied.
- Key point: After liability was established, the judge entered the stipulated backpay and fee awards and directed enforcement through the Secretary of Labor.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
~428
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.) Office of Administrative Law Judges
DAVID THOMAS,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
COMPLAINANT
Docket No. KENT 89-13-D v.
BARB CD 88-16
AMPAK MINING, INC.,
RESPONDENT
Mine No. 1
GEORGE ISSACS,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
COMPLAINANT
Docket No. KENT 89-14-D v.
BARB CD 88-34
AMPAK MINING, INC.,
RESPONDENT
Mine No. 1
DECISION
Appearances: Tony Oppegard, Esq., and Stephen A. Sanders, Esq.
Appalachian Research and Defense Fund of Kentucky, Inc., Hazard, Kentucky for the Complainants;
Geary Burns, Vice President, Ampak Mining, Inc., Van Lear, Kentucky for Respondent Ampak Mining, Inc., G. Graham Martin, Esq., Martin Law Offices, P.S.C., Prestonsburg, Kentucky for Respondent Johnson Coal Company, Inc.
Before: Judge Melick
These proceedings are before me to determine the amount of damages, attorney's fees and costs to be allowed based upon the December 26, 1989, decision finding that Ampak Mining, Inc., discriminated against the Complainants in violation of Section 105(c)(1) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801 et seq., the "Act".
The parties remaining in these cases have reached stipulations as to the damages incurred by the Complainants as follows:
The backpay period for the unlawful demotion of David Thomas is 12/21/87 through 2/14/88; and the backpay period for the unlawful termination of Thomas is 2/15/88 through 7/1/88. Thomas' damages for these periods (what he would have earned at Ampak less his interim earnings) total $6,250, plus interest to be
~429 computed at the time of payment pursuant to the formula employed by the Commission in UMWA v.
Clinchfield Coal Co., 10 FMSHRC 1493 (1988).
The backpay period for the unlawful termination of George Issacs is 4/22/88 through 7/1/88. Issacs' damages for this period total $6,080 plus interest to be computed at the time of payment pursuant to the formula employed by the Commission in Clinchfield Coal Co.
Complainants have also filed a "Statement of Attorney's Fees and Expenses" seeking attorney's fees and litigation expenses of $43,806.80. These fees and expenses are not challenged and are accordingly awarded in accordance with Section 105(c)(3) of the Act.
The Complainants have also filed a pleading captioned "Motion for Leave to Proceed Against Ampak's Owners Individually, Based on the Alter Ego Doctrine, for the Liability Found Herein". In said Motion the Complainants apparently seek to enforce the judgment on this case individually against Geary Burns and Peggy A. Kretzer the alleged owners of the Respondent Ampak Mining Inc.
The Commission stated under similar circumstances in Tolbert v. Chaney Creek Coal Corp., 9 FMSHRC at 1848, (1987), that:
[t]he essential nature of the remedy sought . . . is collection of a judgement debt. This relief involves inter alia, enforcement and execution of the Commission's final decision in this matter. Such an enforcement request is properly directed to the Secretary of Labor. Under the Mine Act the Secretary is empowered to seek compliance with Commission orders in the federal Courts. See 30 U.S.C. 816(b) & 818.
The Complainants herein must therefore direct their enforcement and execution efforts accordingly.
~430
ORDER
Ampak Mining Inc., is hereby directed to pay the noted backpay award plus interest computed in accordance with the Commission decision in UMWA v. Clinchfield Coal Co., 10 FMSHRC 1493 (1988) within 30 days of the date of this decision. Ampak Mining Inc., is further directed to pay the Complainants attorney's fees and litigation expenses of $43,806.80 within 30 days of the date of this decision. The Complainants "Motion for Leave to Proceed Against Ampak's Owners Individually, Based on the Alter Ego Doctrine, for the Liability Found Herein" is denied. This decision represents the final disposition of these proceedings before the undersigned judge.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
What controls your case today?
The Commission reviewed this case, and its decision is the one that controls. Ezel starts there and answers your situation under current law, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace