Adams Stone Corporation (ALJ decision, January 23, 1990)
Adams Stone Corporation (FMSHRC KENT 89-102-DM): Corrected supplemental decision adds interest and penalty
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1990 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Adams Stone Corporation had previously been ordered to pay back wages and other benefits to Fred Bartley in a Mine Act discrimination case. In this corrected supplemental decision, Judge James A. Broderick credited the company for a $9,438 payment already made and calculated $316.75 in interest through December 7, 1988. The judge reaffirmed the earlier findings and orders, directed payment of the interest to Bartley, and assessed a $1,000 civil penalty for the section 105(c) violation.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)
- Outcome: The prior findings and orders were reaffirmed, $316.75 in interest was ordered paid to Bartley, and a $1,000 civil penalty was ordered.
- Key point: A supplemental back-pay order credited prior payment and added interest and the civil penalty required by the discrimination decision.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. ADAMS STONE
DDATE:
19900123
TTEXT:
Page 2
~120
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.) Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. KENT 89-102-DM
ON BEHALF OF FRED BARTLEY,
COMPLAINANT
Jenkins Quarry
v.
ADAMS STONE CORPORATION,
RESPONDENT
CORRECTED SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION
Appearances: Thomas A. Grooms, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Nashville, Tennessee, for Complainant; David Adams, Vice-President, Adams Stone Corporation, Pikeville, Kentucky, for Respondent.
Before: Judge Broderick
Pursuant to my order of December 5, 1989, the Secretary filed a statement of the total back wages due Fred Bartley under the decision issued October 18, 1989. Respondent on January 9, 1990, replied to the Secretary's statement.
The total back wages and other benefits to which Bartley is entitled under the decision amount to $9,438. This amount was paid to Bartley on December 8, 1988, pursuant to an arbitration award. Respondent is therefore given credit for the payment of this amount in accordance with Order No. 3 in the decision issued October 18, 1989. In addition to this amount, Bartley is entitled to interest under the formula set out in UMWA v. Clinchfield Coal Company, 10 FMSHRC 1493 (1988). Interest through December 7, 1988, totals $316.75.
Therefore, IT IS ORDERED:
1. The findings, conclusions and orders of the decision issued October 18, 1989, are REAFFIRMED.
Page 3
~121
2. Respondent shall, within 30 days of the date of this Corrected Supplemental Decision, pay to Complainant the sum of $316.75 representing the interest on the amount of back pay and other benefits to Complainant Bartley on December 8, 1988.
3. Respondent shall, within 30 days of the date of this Corrected Supplemental Decision, pay to the Secretary a civil penalty in the amount of $1000 for the violation of section 105(c) of the Mine Act.
4. This decision is FINAL.
James A. Broderick
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace