Twin Oak Construction Company

Plain-English summary

Twin Oak Construction did not attend the hearing on six civil penalty citations. Judge William Fauver treated the Secretary's allegations as true by default and considered the company's persistent failure to pay earlier penalties as part of its compliance history. He assessed $250 each for four citations and $300 each for two citations. The company was ordered to pay a total of $1,600 within 30 days.

Decision snapshot

• Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 820(i)
• Outcome: Six citations were affirmed by default, and Twin Oak was ordered to pay $1,600.
• Key point: Failure to appear at a penalty hearing can result in default findings and increased penalties based on the operator's payment history.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. TWIN OAK CONSTRUCTION
DDATE:
19890209
TTEXT:

Page 2

~234
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.)
Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. KENT 88-153
PETITIONER A.C. No. 15-14872-03512

v. No. 1 Surface

TWIN OAK CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY,
RESPONDENT

                        DECISION

Appearances: Anne T. Knauff, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, Nashville, Tennessee,
for Petitioner.

Before: Judge Fauver

 The Secretary of Labor brought this proceeding for civil

penalties for alleged violations of safety standards under the
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801 et
seq.

 The case was called for hearing in Huntington, West

Virginia, on January 18, 1989. Government counsel appeared with
her witnesses and documentary evidence. Respondent did not attend
the hearing.

 The Government's inspector was sworn and testified, and the

documentary evidence was received.

 Because of Respondent's default, it is held that the

Secretary is entitled to a default decision. Therefore, the
allegations in the six citations involved are deemed to be true
and are incorporated in this Decision as findings of fact. Also,
the allegations of violations of the cited safety standards are
deemed to be true and are incorporated in this Decision as
conclusions of law.

 Respondent has demonstrated a persistent and deliberate

failure to pay prior civil penalties for violations of mine

Page 3

~235
safety standards that are long overdue and not in present
litigation. In the 24-month period preceding the citations
involved in this case, Respondent was assessed $2,813 for 24
violations and of that amount, Respondent has not paid any of the
civil penalties. The recalcitrance shown by this record of
nonpayment is part of Respondent's compliance history, cognizable
under section 110(i) of the Act. In light of this poor compliance
record, I agree with the Secretary's proposal that the civil
penalties in this case should be higher than the original amounts
proposed.

 Based upon the above, and the other criteria for civil

penalties in section 110(i) of the Act, I assess civil
penalties for the following violations in the amounts shown:

      Citation No.          Civil Penalty

      2979395                    $   250
      2979396                    $   250
      2979397                    $   250
      2979398                    $   250
      2979399                    $   300
      2979400                    $   300

                                 $1,600

                         ORDER

 WHEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that Respondent shall pay the above

civil penalties of $1,600 within 30 days of this Decision.

                                 William Fauver
                                 Administrative Law Judge