Jericol Mining Inc. (ALJ decision, October 21, 1988)
Jericol Mining Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 88-135-D): Discrimination complaint dismissed
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1988 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
David Johnson asked to withdraw his discrimination complaint against Jericol Mining Inc. because he no longer wanted a hearing. Judge Roy J. Maurer granted permission to withdraw the complaint under 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11. The case was dismissed.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11
- Outcome: The discrimination complaint was withdrawn and dismissed.
- Key point: A complainant may withdraw a discrimination complaint with the Judge's permission.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
DAVID JOHNSON V. JERICOL MINING INC.
DDATE:
19881021
TTEXT:
Page 2
~1455
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.) Office of Administrative Law Judges
DAVID JOHNSON,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
COMPLAINANT
Docket No. KENT 88-135-D
v. BARB CD 88-20
JERICOL MINING INC.,
Darby's Mine
RESPONDENT
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Before: Judge Maurer
The Complainant, David Johnson, requests approval to withdraw his Complaint in the captioned case on the grounds that he has reconsidered his decision to proceed with the Complaint and no longer desires a hearing concerning this matter. Under the circumstances herein, permission to withdraw is granted. 29 C.F.R. 2700.11. The case is therefore dismissed.
Roy J. Maurer
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace