Bowling Mountain Mining Corporation (ALJ decision, January 27, 1989)

Bowling Mountain Mining Corporation (FMSHRC KENT 88-133): Fatal roof fall violations settled for $7,000

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
KENT 88-133
Decided
January 27, 1989
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-17

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1989 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1989
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final order, not Commission precedent
This decision by a FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge became the final decision of the Commission 40 days after issuance because the Commission did not direct review (30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1)). It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The judge approved a settlement reducing five civil penalties from $9,300 to $7,000.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

MSHA cited Bowling Mountain Mining Corporation for five violations after a roof fall at Mine No. 2 killed acting foreman Truman Faulkner. The violations concerned roof support, a required preshift examination, miner training, and reporting the fatal accident. The judge approved a settlement reducing the original combined penalties from $9,300 to $7,000. The operator and, by agreement, its president and principal stockholder were ordered to pay the settlement in monthly installments, after which the case would be dismissed.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 75.200, 75.303, 48.6, and 50.10
  • Outcome: Five violations were settled for a reduced total penalty of $7,000, payable in installments.
  • Key point: A settlement may reduce the proposed penalty when the parties provide a detailed explanation of the violations and the reduction.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. BOWLING MOUNTAIN MINING
DDATE:
19890127
TTEXT:


Page 2

~119
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.) Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. KENT 88-133
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 15-14701-03524

v. Mine No. 2

BOWLING MOUNTAIN MINING
CORPORATION
RESPONDENT

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Before: Judge Maurer

On December 29, 1988, the Secretary of Labor on behalf of the parties to this action, filed a motion to approve the settlement negotiated between them. At issue in this case are five violations, originally assessed at $9300 in the aggregate. Settlement is proposed at $7000.

The above-refenced violations were discovered as a result of on investigation into a fatal roof fall accident which occurred on September 28, 1987, killing Truman Faulkner, an acting foreman at the mine. More particularly, the operator was cited for a violation of 30 C.F.R. 75.200 because it failed to provide additional roof support after encountering adverse roof conditions, as required by its roof control plan. Mud seams, indicating adverse roof conditions, had been encountered, but no additional support was ordered set by Faulkner. This negligence contributed to his death. The company was cited for another, separate violation of 30 C.F.R. 75.200 because the acting foreman, Faulkner, failed to install temporary roof support before working on unsupported roof, also as required by it's roof control plan. The roof fall that killed Faulkner was directly attributable to this violation.

The operator was also cited for not conducting the required pre-shift examination of the mine since September 24, 1987, and more particularly, on September 28, 1987, the day Faulkner was killed. This is a serious violation of 30 C.F.R. 75.303, although it does not appear as though this violation directly contributed to Faulkner's death.


Page 3

~120
Additionally, the respondent was cited for a violation of 30 C.F.R. 48.6, because the operator had not provided newly employed experienced miner training to the deceased miner, Truman Faulkner, although he had been working at the mine for approximately three (3) weeks at the time of his death.

Lastly, the respondent was cited for a violation of 30 C.F.R.
50.10 because the operator failed to report the roof fall accident which caused the fatal injury to Truman Faulkner. MSHA was notified of the accident by a state mine inspector, but did not receive direct notification from the operator.

The Solicitor states that mining of coal at the mine where the violations occurred has ceased and this mine has now been sealed.

In support of the proposed settlement, the Solicitor further states his belief that approval of this settlement is in the public interest and that the circumstances presented warrant the reduction in the original civil penalty assessments for the violations in question. Further, he has submitted a detailed discussion and disclosure as to the facts and circumstances surrounding the issuance of the citations and orders, as well as a full explanation and justification for the proposed reduction.

I accept the Solicitor's representations and approve the settlements.

ORDER

The operator, and by agreement, Mr. Charles E. McCullah, President and principal stockholder of Bowling Mountain Coal Company, Inc., d/b/a Bowling Mountain Mining Corporation, personally, is ordered to pay $7000 in eight equal monthly installments of $777.77 and one last installment of 777.84, beginning November 1, 1988, and payable by the first day of each month thereafter, until paid in full. Upon receipt of payment in full by the Secretary, this case is dismissed.

Roy J. Maurer
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace