Lamar Mining Company and Larry Williams, Graham Martin and Williams & Martin Coal Co. (ALJ decision, February 26, 1987)

Danny Johnson v. Lamar Mining Company et al. (FMSHRC KENT 87-68-D): Discrimination settlement approved and case dismissed

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
KENT 87-68-D
Decided
February 26, 1987
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-22
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1987
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: FMSHRC released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Danny Johnson filed a Mine Act discrimination proceeding against Lamar Mining Company, Larry Williams, Graham Martin, and Williams & Martin Coal Company. The parties reached a settlement requiring the operator to pay Johnson $5,000 in four equal installments, with the final payment due May 18, 1987. Judge Paul Merlin found that the settlement was consistent with the purposes of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act. He approved the settlement, granted Johnson's motion to withdraw the complaint, and dismissed the case.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, the complaint was withdrawn, and the discrimination proceeding was dismissed.
  • Key point: The ALJ accepted a payment-based settlement as consistent with the purposes of the Mine Act.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
DANNY JOHNSON v. LAMAR MINING
DDATE:
19870226
TTEXT:


Page 2

~367

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

DANNY JOHNSON,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
COMPLAINANT
v. Docket No. KENT 87-68-D

LAMAR MINING COMPANY AND
BARB CD 87-04

LARRY WILLIAMS,
Lotts Creek Strip Mine

GRAHAM MARTIN AND

WILLIAMS & MARTIN COAL CO.,
RESPONDENT

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before: Judge Merlin

The Complainant has filed a motion to withdraw his complaint and dismiss this proceeding on the grounds that a settlement has been reached with the operator. The settlement agreement requires the operator to pay $5,000 to the Complainant in four equal installments, the final payment to be made May 18, 1987.

The settlement is Approved as it is in accord with the purposes of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977.

Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED.

Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace