Wilmon Moore D/B/A Big Blue Trucking (ALJ decision, May 28, 1987)

Wilmon Moore D/B/A Big Blue Trucking (FMSHRC KENT 87-58): Settlement approved at $150

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
KENT 87-58
Decided
May 28, 1987
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-21

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1987
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Wilmon Moore, doing business as Big Blue Trucking, faced a civil penalty proceeding before the Commission. The parties proposed reducing the assessment from $450 to $150 and dismissing the case after payment. Judge Gary Melick reviewed the representations and supporting documentation, approved the settlement, and ordered payment of $150 within 30 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited provisions: None stated in this order.
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved and a $150 penalty was assessed.
  • Key point: The judge approved the reduced penalty after finding the settlement appropriate under the statutory criteria.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. WILMON BLUE
DDATE:
19870528
TTEXT:


Page 2

~976

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. KENT 87-58
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 15-07295-03502

v. Martiki Surface

WILMON MOORE D/B/A BIG BLUE
TRUCKING,
RESPONDENT

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Appearances: Thomas A. Grooms, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Nashville, Tennessee, for Petitioner; Wilmon Moore, Lovely, Kentucky, pro se.

Before: Judge Melick

This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of civil penalty under section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). At hearing Petitioner filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss the case. A reduction in penalty from $450 to $150 was proposed. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in section 110(i) of the Act.

WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $150 within 30 days of this order.

Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace