Triple Elkhorn Mining Company (ALJ decision, May 28, 1987)

Triple Elkhorn Mining Company (FMSHRC KENT 87-44 and KENT 87-45): Settlements approved at $1,500

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
KENT 87-44, KENT 87-45
Decided
May 28, 1987
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-21

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1987
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Triple Elkhorn Mining Company faced civil penalty proceedings in two dockets at its No. 2 Surface Mine. The parties proposed reducing the combined penalties from $1,866 to $1,500 and dismissing the cases after payment. Judge Gary Melick reviewed the parties' representations and documentation, approved the settlements, and ordered payment of $1,500 within 30 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited provisions: None stated in this order.
  • Outcome: The settlements were approved and $1,500 in penalties were assessed.
  • Key point: The judge approved the reduced combined penalties after finding the settlements appropriate under the statutory criteria.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. TRIPLE MINING
DDATE:
19870528
TTEXT:


Page 2

~974

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. KENT 87-44
PETITIONER A.C. No. 15-13508-03515

v. Docket No. KENT 87-45
A.C. No. 15-13508-03516
TRIPLE ELKHORN MINING
COMPANY,
No. 2 Surface Mine
RESPONDENT

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Appearances: Carl W. Gerig, Jr., Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Nashville, Tennessee, for the Petitioner;
Mr. Travis E. Miller, President, Triple Elkhorn Mining Company, Harold, Kentucky, for the Respondent.

Before: Judge Melick

These cases are before me upon petitions for assessment of civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). At hearing, Petitioner filed motions to approve settlement agreements and to dismiss these cases. A reduction in penalties from $1,866 to $1,500 was proposed. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted, and I conclude that the proffered settlements are appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.

WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay penalties of $1,500 within 30 days of this order.

Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace