Richard Coal Company
Richard Coal Company (FMSHRC KENT 87-43-D): Discrimination case dismissed under settlement
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Howard H. Ross and Richard Coal Company jointly reported that all matters in the discrimination case had been settled. The parties agreed that the proceeding should be dismissed with prejudice. Judge Avram Weisberger entered the agreed dismissal.
Decision snapshot
- Cited provisions: None stated in this order.
- Outcome: The settled discrimination case was dismissed with prejudice.
- Key point: A jointly reported settlement can resolve a discrimination proceeding through dismissal with prejudice.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
HOWARD ROSS V. RICHLAND COAL
DDATE:
19870602
TTEXT:
Page 2
~1007
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Office of Administrative Law Judges
HOWARD H. ROSS, DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
COMPLAINANT
Docket No. KENT 87-43-D
v.
BARB CD 86-83
RICHARD COAL COMPANY,
RESPONDENT Surface No. 1 Mine
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
On May 20, 1987, Counsel for both Parties jointly filed a
settlement in which they indicated that all matters in this case
are settled, and that they agreed for a dismissal with prejudice.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case is dismissed with
prejudice.
Avram Weisberger
Administrative Law Judge
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1987, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.